Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review

Voice quality (VQ) is frequently analysed in phonetic and phonological research. Recently, there has been motivation to assess VQ more ‘objectively’ using acoustics. Our systematic review revealed a notable research focus on pathological speakers, with 48% of excluded studies being rejected for investigating pathological populations. Among studies involving non-pathological speakers, the analysed speech material is often restricted to sustained vowel productions. Therefore, the reliability of acoustic techniques when analysisng more naturalistic speech and non-pathological speakers remains unclear. We present a systematic literature review of acoustic methods used to categorise breathy and whispery VQ in non-pathological speakers. The literature was surveyed using four databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science) and ICPhS proceedings between 1999-2023. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducting an acoustic analysis of breathy and whispery voices for vocally healthy speakers. Initial searches yielded 754 papers. Once filtered 21 papers remained. The results reveal some consistency in the main acoustic parameters for breathy VQ (higher spectral tilt and lower HNR/CPP). Whispery voice was only addressed in two studies meaning no trends were observed. We conclude that there remain inconsistencies in methods and findings, meaning we cannot identify an agreed ‘standard’ approach generally applicable to non-pathological speakers.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.119849
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review

article en

Abstract

Voice quality (VQ) is frequently analysed in phonetic and phonological research. Recently, there has been motivation to assess VQ more ‘objectively’ using acoustics. Our systematic review revealed a notable research focus on pathological speakers, with 48% of excluded studies being rejected for investigating pathological populations. Among studies involving non-pathological speakers, the analysed speech material is often restricted to sustained vowel productions. Therefore, the reliability of acoustic techniques when analysisng more naturalistic speech and non-pathological speakers remains unclear. We present a systematic literature review of acoustic methods used to categorise breathy and whispery VQ in non-pathological speakers. The literature was surveyed using four databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science) and ICPhS proceedings between 1999-2023. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducting an acoustic analysis of breathy and whispery voices for vocally healthy speakers. Initial searches yielded 754 papers. Once filtered 21 papers remained. The results reveal some consistency in the main acoustic parameters for breathy VQ (higher spectral tilt and lower HNR/CPP). Whispery voice was only addressed in two studies meaning no trends were observed. We conclude that there remain inconsistencies in methods and findings, meaning we cannot identify an agreed ‘standard’ approach generally applicable to non-pathological speakers.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS