Corporate rescue reform in Nigeria

This thesis critically examines the corporate rescue reform in Nigeria, focusing on the extent to which the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020 facilitates the effective and efficient rescue of financially distressed companies. Historically, Nigeria’s insolvency law significantly focused on creditor recovery, resulting in the winding up of companies in financial distress, which increased business closures, loss of jobs, and economic uncertainty. This traditional approach to insolvency, entrenched under the CAMA 1990, provided limited corporate rescue options. Hence, the CAMA 2020 was enacted, in part, to shift the focus of Nigeria’s insolvency law from liquidation and winding-up to the rescue of companies with the introduction of modern corporate rescue tools such as the Companies Voluntary Arrangement and Administration. Taking a comparative and analytical approach, the thesis interrogates the corporate rescue models from leading Anglo-American jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, and the African jurisdictions, such as Kenya and South Africa, to provide a basis for assessing CAMA 2020. It demonstrates that CAMA 2020 incorporates the hallmarks of an effective and efficient insolvency system based on the benchmark under the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide. However, it argues that the attempt to shift the focus of Nigeria’s insolvency law has not altered the statistics on corporate failure due to practical challenges that limit the application of CAMA 2020. These challenges are particularly evident in the lack of a cross-border insolvency framework and weak institutional capacity. By benchmarking Nigeria’s corporate rescue model with the models from select African jurisdictions, Nigeria can draw lessons to strengthen its corporate rescue policy. The thesis, therefore, highlights the need for substantial alignment with international best practices, including the need to strengthen relevant institutions to support more efficient implementation of the corporate rescue tools under CAMA 2020.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Lancaster
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2835
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate rescue reform in Nigeria

University of Lancaster
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Corporate rescue reform in Nigeria

article en

Abstract

This thesis critically examines the corporate rescue reform in Nigeria, focusing on the extent to which the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020 facilitates the effective and efficient rescue of financially distressed companies. Historically, Nigeria’s insolvency law significantly focused on creditor recovery, resulting in the winding up of companies in financial distress, which increased business closures, loss of jobs, and economic uncertainty. This traditional approach to insolvency, entrenched under the CAMA 1990, provided limited corporate rescue options. Hence, the CAMA 2020 was enacted, in part, to shift the focus of Nigeria’s insolvency law from liquidation and winding-up to the rescue of companies with the introduction of modern corporate rescue tools such as the Companies Voluntary Arrangement and Administration. Taking a comparative and analytical approach, the thesis interrogates the corporate rescue models from leading Anglo-American jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom and the United States, and the African jurisdictions, such as Kenya and South Africa, to provide a basis for assessing CAMA 2020. It demonstrates that CAMA 2020 incorporates the hallmarks of an effective and efficient insolvency system based on the benchmark under the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide. However, it argues that the attempt to shift the focus of Nigeria’s insolvency law has not altered the statistics on corporate failure due to practical challenges that limit the application of CAMA 2020. These challenges are particularly evident in the lack of a cross-border insolvency framework and weak institutional capacity. By benchmarking Nigeria’s corporate rescue model with the models from select African jurisdictions, Nigeria can draw lessons to strengthen its corporate rescue policy. The thesis, therefore, highlights the need for substantial alignment with international best practices, including the need to strengthen relevant institutions to support more efficient implementation of the corporate rescue tools under CAMA 2020.

University of Lancaster
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.