The Illusion of Objectivity: How Language Constructs Authority

This chapter investigates the grammatical and pragmatic strategies by which institutional discourse creates an illusion of objectivity to legitimize authority. It explores how agentless passives, impersonal constructions, and modal expressions (e.g., "it must be done") obscure authorship and intention, projecting necessity and neutrality. Far from being ideologically neutral, such linguistic forms restrict interpretive possibilities and reinforce epistemic closure. Drawing on systemic functional linguistics and pragmatic theory, the analysis is supported by examples from legal, academic, and religious discourse. The chapter contributes to a broader understanding of how language functions as a vehicle for institutional power and discursive control. Keywords (EN): Institutional discourse, grammatical agency, objectivity, epistemic closure, authority, systemic functional linguistics, deontic modality, legal language DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15395917 This work is also published with DOI reference in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29218724 and SRRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5258415

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/08m8w-tea58
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Illusion of Objectivity: How Language Constructs Authority

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

The Illusion of Objectivity: How Language Constructs Authority

article en

Abstract

This chapter investigates the grammatical and pragmatic strategies by which institutional discourse creates an illusion of objectivity to legitimize authority. It explores how agentless passives, impersonal constructions, and modal expressions (e.g., "it must be done") obscure authorship and intention, projecting necessity and neutrality. Far from being ideologically neutral, such linguistic forms restrict interpretive possibilities and reinforce epistemic closure. Drawing on systemic functional linguistics and pragmatic theory, the analysis is supported by examples from legal, academic, and religious discourse. The chapter contributes to a broader understanding of how language functions as a vehicle for institutional power and discursive control. Keywords (EN): Institutional discourse, grammatical agency, objectivity, epistemic closure, authority, systemic functional linguistics, deontic modality, legal language DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15395917 This work is also published with DOI reference in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29218724 and SRRN http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5258415

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), University of Palermo (AR), Universidad La República (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.