The need for speed

Carbohydrate supplementation is a strategy used by athletes to enhance performance and delay fatigue during endurance or high-intensity exercise. Carbohydrates are a primary fuel source for muscles, especially during prolonged or intense physical activity, where glycogen can be depleted. Supplementing with easily digestible carbohydrate sources, like bars or gels, helps maintain blood glucose, replenish glycogen stores, and enhance performance. While the effectiveness of carbohydrate supplementation is well documented, the variety of commercially available products, each with differing carbohydrate compositions, warrants further exploration of their specific metabolic effects and practical benefits. This thesis investigates the ecological validity of three popular commercially available carbohydrate energy supplements, focusing on their ability to provide rapid energy and how this may influence performance outcomes. The first study assessed the speed of carbohydrate delivery from a glucosefructose energy bar (Voom Pocket Rocket, VOOM), a glucose-fructose hydrogel (Maurten Gel 160, MAU), and a maltodextrin-based gel (SIS Go Isotonic, SIS). A modified oral glucose tolerance test revealed VOOM provided carbohydrates as quickly, if not faster, than MAU and SIS, with significantly greater carbohydrate oxidation than SIS. The second study examined the effects of these products on repeated maximal sprint performance. Despite differences in metabolic responses over time, no significant effects were found on sprint performance metrics, like peak power or total work. Collectively, the findings of this thesis highlight that while carbohydrate delivery speed may vary between products, the type of supplement may not significantly affect sprint performance. This thesis directly compares commercially available energy supplements - a glucosefructose energy bar, a glucose-fructose hydrogel, and a maltodextrin-based gel - each with distinct carbohydrate compositions. These findings provide valuable insights to help athletes make informed decisions about carbohydrate supplementation, allowing them to choose based on personal preference and convenience, with confidence that these products offer comparable performance benefits.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Lancaster
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2761
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The need for speed

University of Lancaster
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

The need for speed

article en

Abstract

Carbohydrate supplementation is a strategy used by athletes to enhance performance and delay fatigue during endurance or high-intensity exercise. Carbohydrates are a primary fuel source for muscles, especially during prolonged or intense physical activity, where glycogen can be depleted. Supplementing with easily digestible carbohydrate sources, like bars or gels, helps maintain blood glucose, replenish glycogen stores, and enhance performance. While the effectiveness of carbohydrate supplementation is well documented, the variety of commercially available products, each with differing carbohydrate compositions, warrants further exploration of their specific metabolic effects and practical benefits. This thesis investigates the ecological validity of three popular commercially available carbohydrate energy supplements, focusing on their ability to provide rapid energy and how this may influence performance outcomes. The first study assessed the speed of carbohydrate delivery from a glucosefructose energy bar (Voom Pocket Rocket, VOOM), a glucose-fructose hydrogel (Maurten Gel 160, MAU), and a maltodextrin-based gel (SIS Go Isotonic, SIS). A modified oral glucose tolerance test revealed VOOM provided carbohydrates as quickly, if not faster, than MAU and SIS, with significantly greater carbohydrate oxidation than SIS. The second study examined the effects of these products on repeated maximal sprint performance. Despite differences in metabolic responses over time, no significant effects were found on sprint performance metrics, like peak power or total work. Collectively, the findings of this thesis highlight that while carbohydrate delivery speed may vary between products, the type of supplement may not significantly affect sprint performance. This thesis directly compares commercially available energy supplements - a glucosefructose energy bar, a glucose-fructose hydrogel, and a maltodextrin-based gel - each with distinct carbohydrate compositions. These findings provide valuable insights to help athletes make informed decisions about carbohydrate supplementation, allowing them to choose based on personal preference and convenience, with confidence that these products offer comparable performance benefits.

University of Lancaster
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The need for speed · University of Lancaster (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS