POPULATION HEALTH OUTCOMES & THE IMPORTANCE OF STRUCTURED DATA FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

<strong>Introduction</strong>: Population Health Outcomes (PHOs) collected between accreditation cycles have shown limited impact in demonstrating Health Department (HD) accreditation outcomes. Due to HDs' dissatisfaction and the extensive time required for reporting, the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) is considering changes. This study explores the challenges and potential improvements through interviews with PHAB staff. <strong>Methods</strong>: Thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with five key informants from PHAB&rsquo;s Accreditation &amp; Recognition and Research &amp; Product Development teams. Informants provided insights on strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement, including equity integration. A coding tool was used to analyze responses. <strong>Results</strong>: 42% of codes suggested improvements, with "Storytelling" as the most common theme. 30% of codes addressed challenges, while only 8% highlighted positive aspects. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Revising the PHOs reporting process could make data more intuitive and better demonstrate the impact of accreditation. &nbsp;

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/v891-n655
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POPULATION HEALTH OUTCOMES & THE IMPORTANCE OF STRUCTURED DATA FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

UNC Libraries
Public Health Policies and Education
article

POPULATION HEALTH OUTCOMES & THE IMPORTANCE OF STRUCTURED DATA FOR HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

article en

Abstract

<strong>Introduction</strong>: Population Health Outcomes (PHOs) collected between accreditation cycles have shown limited impact in demonstrating Health Department (HD) accreditation outcomes. Due to HDs' dissatisfaction and the extensive time required for reporting, the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) is considering changes. This study explores the challenges and potential improvements through interviews with PHAB staff. <strong>Methods</strong>: Thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with five key informants from PHAB&rsquo;s Accreditation &amp; Recognition and Research &amp; Product Development teams. Informants provided insights on strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement, including equity integration. A coding tool was used to analyze responses. <strong>Results</strong>: 42% of codes suggested improvements, with "Storytelling" as the most common theme. 30% of codes addressed challenges, while only 8% highlighted positive aspects. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: Revising the PHOs reporting process could make data more intuitive and better demonstrate the impact of accreditation. &nbsp;

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.