Gaia BH1 and BH2 – evolutionary models with overshooting of the black hole progenitors within the present-day binary separation

ABSTRACT Three black holes (BHs) in wide binaries – Gaia BH1, BH2, and BH3 – were recently discovered. The likely progenitors of the BHs were massive stars that experienced a supergiant phase, reaching radii of $\sim\!\! 1000 \ \mathrm{ R}_{\odot }$, before collapsing to form the BH. Such radii are difficult to accommodate with the present-day orbits of BH1 and BH2 – with semimajor axes of 1.4 and 3.7 au, respectively. In this letter, we show that the maximal radii of the supergiants are not necessarily so large, and realistic stellar evolution models, with some assumed overshooting above the convective core into the radiative stellar envelope, produce substantially smaller maximal radii. The limited expansion of supergiants is consistent with the empirical Humphreys–Davidson limit – the absence of red supergiants above an upper luminosity limit, notably lower than the highest luminosity of main-sequence stars. We propose that the evolution that led to the formation of Gaia BH1 and BH2 simply did not involve an expansion to the cool supergiant phase.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.112335
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaia BH1 and BH2 – evolutionary models with overshooting of the black hole progenitors within the present-day binary separation

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
article

Gaia BH1 and BH2 – evolutionary models with overshooting of the black hole progenitors within the present-day binary separation

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three black holes (BHs) in wide binaries – Gaia BH1, BH2, and BH3 – were recently discovered. The likely progenitors of the BHs were massive stars that experienced a supergiant phase, reaching radii of $\sim\!\! 1000 \ \mathrm{ R}_{\odot }$, before collapsing to form the BH. Such radii are difficult to accommodate with the present-day orbits of BH1 and BH2 – with semimajor axes of 1.4 and 3.7 au, respectively. In this letter, we show that the maximal radii of the supergiants are not necessarily so large, and realistic stellar evolution models, with some assumed overshooting above the convective core into the radiative stellar envelope, produce substantially smaller maximal radii. The limited expansion of supergiants is consistent with the empirical Humphreys–Davidson limit – the absence of red supergiants above an upper luminosity limit, notably lower than the highest luminosity of main-sequence stars. We propose that the evolution that led to the formation of Gaia BH1 and BH2 simply did not involve an expansion to the cool supergiant phase.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gaia BH1 and BH2 – evolutionary models with overshooting of the black hole progenitors within the present-day binary separation · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS