Empirical Support for a new Taxonomy of Sadness: a Factor Analysis

Sadness is a complex emotion and has undergone several reclassifications. The structure and composition of sadness has been broken down into several differential sad states - differing in valence, arousal, outcomes, and situational context. This classification of sad states sought to explain the differential sad states experienced by individuals and how this impacts experiences of depression. This classification, however, was completely theoretical. In this study, a sad states measure (SSM) was designed and underwent exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with the aim of providing empirical evidence for the existence of these sad states. Data from 748 participants was collected. The exploratory factor analysis used a random split half of the sample, while a confirmatory factor analysis used the other split half. Ultimately, a seven-factor solution was extracted comprising latent constructs labelled: grief, melancholia, bleak, empathic sadness, sweet sorrow, comforting sorrow, and sublime sorrow. Strong goodness-of-fit measures supported the factor model and the observed factors aligned closely with the sad states proposed in previous literature. The individual states were then entered into in a regression analysis with depression as the outcome variable. Three states were found to be significant predictors of depression. These findings provide empirical evidence of differential sad states and suggest a close link between specific sad states and depression – suggesting a potential clinical impact of this understanding.

Publication Details

Journal
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/q8dm5
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Support for a new Taxonomy of Sadness: a Factor Analysis

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

Empirical Support for a new Taxonomy of Sadness: a Factor Analysis

article en

Abstract

Sadness is a complex emotion and has undergone several reclassifications. The structure and composition of sadness has been broken down into several differential sad states - differing in valence, arousal, outcomes, and situational context. This classification of sad states sought to explain the differential sad states experienced by individuals and how this impacts experiences of depression. This classification, however, was completely theoretical. In this study, a sad states measure (SSM) was designed and underwent exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, with the aim of providing empirical evidence for the existence of these sad states. Data from 748 participants was collected. The exploratory factor analysis used a random split half of the sample, while a confirmatory factor analysis used the other split half. Ultimately, a seven-factor solution was extracted comprising latent constructs labelled: grief, melancholia, bleak, empathic sadness, sweet sorrow, comforting sorrow, and sublime sorrow. Strong goodness-of-fit measures supported the factor model and the observed factors aligned closely with the sad states proposed in previous literature. The individual states were then entered into in a regression analysis with depression as the outcome variable. Three states were found to be significant predictors of depression. These findings provide empirical evidence of differential sad states and suggest a close link between specific sad states and depression – suggesting a potential clinical impact of this understanding.

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.