Exploring the Organizational Effects of the Accreditation Process on Quality Culture in an Intensive English Language Program

Accreditation processes can shape, disrupt, or reinforce organizational practices and values; this study examines how such effects manifest in the context of a quality culture. Guided by the Competing Values Framework (CVF) as both a theoretical and methodological tool, this qualitative case study explores how accreditation influences the cultural and operational dynamics of an English preparatory program at İstanbul Bilgi University in Turkey. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with faculty and administrators, alongside document analysis, to capture organizational narratives before, during, and after the accreditation process. Key findings suggest that accreditation can enhance a culture of quality by fostering self-assessment, structured planning, and professional development. However, these gains are tempered by tensions related to documentation overload, unclear standards, and uneven faculty engagement. While some participants described the process as empowering and collegial, others viewed it as externally imposed and administratively burdensome. The study underscores the importance of institutional commitment and distributed leadership in navigating these tensions. These insights point to the potential of accreditation to support systemic learning and sustainable quality enhancement—if understood and implemented as a reflective, inclusive process. By highlighting both the enabling and constraining forces at play, this research contributes to a more critical and nuanced understanding of accreditation’s role in shaping quality cultures within higher education.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Liverpool
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17638/03192764
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Organizational Effects of the Accreditation Process on Quality Culture in an Intensive English Language Program

University of Liverpool
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Exploring the Organizational Effects of the Accreditation Process on Quality Culture in an Intensive English Language Program

article en

Abstract

Accreditation processes can shape, disrupt, or reinforce organizational practices and values; this study examines how such effects manifest in the context of a quality culture. Guided by the Competing Values Framework (CVF) as both a theoretical and methodological tool, this qualitative case study explores how accreditation influences the cultural and operational dynamics of an English preparatory program at İstanbul Bilgi University in Turkey. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with faculty and administrators, alongside document analysis, to capture organizational narratives before, during, and after the accreditation process. Key findings suggest that accreditation can enhance a culture of quality by fostering self-assessment, structured planning, and professional development. However, these gains are tempered by tensions related to documentation overload, unclear standards, and uneven faculty engagement. While some participants described the process as empowering and collegial, others viewed it as externally imposed and administratively burdensome. The study underscores the importance of institutional commitment and distributed leadership in navigating these tensions. These insights point to the potential of accreditation to support systemic learning and sustainable quality enhancement—if understood and implemented as a reflective, inclusive process. By highlighting both the enabling and constraining forces at play, this research contributes to a more critical and nuanced understanding of accreditation’s role in shaping quality cultures within higher education.

University of Liverpool
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Organizational Effects of the Accreditation Process on Quality Culture in an Intensive English Language Program · University of Liverpool (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS