Supplemental analyses.

<div><p>Experts have called for public engagement with the governance of controversial scientific research and discoveries, including CRISPR, the technology that enables gene editing. Though engaging and informing citizens who are not interested in the issue is a challenge, recent studies suggest humor has potential to close interest and knowledge gaps. We tested this potential by exposing individuals (<i>N</i> = 303) to one of three videos (an edited clip from <i>Last Week Tonight</i>, an edited clip from <i>60 Minutes</i>, or control) that contained broadly overlapping facts about gene editing in an online survey. Results show that while exposure to the <i>Last Week Tonight</i> clip did not increase attentiveness to the issue of human gene editing among individuals with lower levels of interest in science, exposure to the humorous clip caused a modest improvement in issue knowledge. Positive main effects on perceived knowledge were found for both treatments. More research is needed but findings suggest that the use of humor in science communication offers potential, though perhaps limited, for broadening public engagement with emerging areas of science.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306563.s003
Primary Topic
Soil and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supplemental analyses.

Figshare
Soil and Environmental Studies
article

Supplemental analyses.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Experts have called for public engagement with the governance of controversial scientific research and discoveries, including CRISPR, the technology that enables gene editing. Though engaging and informing citizens who are not interested in the issue is a challenge, recent studies suggest humor has potential to close interest and knowledge gaps. We tested this potential by exposing individuals (<i>N</i> = 303) to one of three videos (an edited clip from <i>Last Week Tonight</i>, an edited clip from <i>60 Minutes</i>, or control) that contained broadly overlapping facts about gene editing in an online survey. Results show that while exposure to the <i>Last Week Tonight</i> clip did not increase attentiveness to the issue of human gene editing among individuals with lower levels of interest in science, exposure to the humorous clip caused a modest improvement in issue knowledge. Positive main effects on perceived knowledge were found for both treatments. More research is needed but findings suggest that the use of humor in science communication offers potential, though perhaps limited, for broadening public engagement with emerging areas of science.</p></div>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Soil and Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Supplemental analyses. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS