PRISMA 2020 checklist.

<div><p>Background</p><p>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition in urology, and studies on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for this condition have been conducted; however, the evidence remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP in treating ED.</p><p>Methods</p><p>On May 17, 2024, a literature search was performed and evaluated using the Cochrane method. The primary outcome measured was the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, while the secondary outcomes included Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and peak systolic velocity (PSV).</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 12 controlled trials involving 991 patients and 11 single-arm trials with 377 patients were analyzed. The findings revealed that compared to the control group, the PRP group demonstrated better outcomes in terms of the IIEF score and MCID (SMD = 0.59 (95% CI: [0.34, 0.84]; RR = 1.94 (95% CI: [1.33, 2.83]), In the single-arm trials, a significant improvement in IIEF scores was observed following PRP treatment (SMD = -0.99 95% CI: [-1.53, 0.46]).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>PRP appears effective in treating erectile dysfunction, but further high-quality, large-sample trials with longer follow-up are needed to fully understand its effects.</p></div>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313074.s001
Primary Topic
Soil and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

Figshare
Soil and Environmental Studies
article

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

article en

Abstract

<div><p>Background</p><p>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent condition in urology, and studies on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for this condition have been conducted; however, the evidence remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP in treating ED.</p><p>Methods</p><p>On May 17, 2024, a literature search was performed and evaluated using the Cochrane method. The primary outcome measured was the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, while the secondary outcomes included Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and peak systolic velocity (PSV).</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 12 controlled trials involving 991 patients and 11 single-arm trials with 377 patients were analyzed. The findings revealed that compared to the control group, the PRP group demonstrated better outcomes in terms of the IIEF score and MCID (SMD = 0.59 (95% CI: [0.34, 0.84]; RR = 1.94 (95% CI: [1.33, 2.83]), In the single-arm trials, a significant improvement in IIEF scores was observed following PRP treatment (SMD = -0.99 95% CI: [-1.53, 0.46]).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>PRP appears effective in treating erectile dysfunction, but further high-quality, large-sample trials with longer follow-up are needed to fully understand its effects.</p></div>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Soil and Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PRISMA 2020 checklist. · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS