‘Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children!’ – Online content promoting/encouraging self-harm and the law: A socio-legal study

With a new communication offence having been proposed by the Law Commission and adopted in the draft Online Safety Bill, this article considers how the law should deal with online content promoting/encouraging self-harm to adequately protect victims, with a particular focus on children. To do so, I consider three pertinent issues: the adequacy of existing communication offences; the need to balance freedom of expression concerns against factors weighing in favour of restrictions; and the different conceptions of the child as influences to justify protection. From these analyses, overall, I argue that the Law Commission’s proposal is inadequate and insufficient as a means of protection and offer suggestions for improvement accordingly.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
York
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15124/yao-h290-mv07
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children!’ – Online content promoting/encouraging self-harm and the law: A socio-legal study

York
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

‘Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children!’ – Online content promoting/encouraging self-harm and the law: A socio-legal study

article en

Abstract

With a new communication offence having been proposed by the Law Commission and adopted in the draft Online Safety Bill, this article considers how the law should deal with online content promoting/encouraging self-harm to adequately protect victims, with a particular focus on children. To do so, I consider three pertinent issues: the adequacy of existing communication offences; the need to balance freedom of expression concerns against factors weighing in favour of restrictions; and the different conceptions of the child as influences to justify protection. From these analyses, overall, I argue that the Law Commission’s proposal is inadequate and insufficient as a means of protection and offer suggestions for improvement accordingly.

York
University of York (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.