Research on prediction of bottom hole flowing pressure for vertical coalbed methane wells based on improved SSA-BPNN

Coalbed methane resources are extensively developed using vertical wells, with controlled-pressure and controlled-water drainage systems. The flowing bottom hole pressure is a crucial parameter in the design of drainage schemes and equipment selection. Therefore, it is of great significance to predict the flowing bottom hole pressure for vertical coalbed methane wells. To conveniently and accurately forecast the flowing bottom hole pressure of vertical coalbed methane and guide their pressure control and drainage, a Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) algorithm from the field of machine learning was introduced. Additionally, the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) was improved. These were coupled to establish a forecasting model for flowing bottom hole pressure based on the improved SSA-BPNN approach. Five routinely measured parameters that influence flowing bottom hole pressure were selected as the input parameters for the prediction model, with corresponding bottom hole pressure values as the output parameters. A total of 600 sets of field-measured data were partitioned into training, validation, and testing datasets to develop and validate the forecasting model for vertical coalbed methane wells. The validation set showed that the mean absolute percentage errors for the BPNN model and the Improved SSA-BPNN model on the validation set were 3.10% and 0.53%, respectively. This demonstrated that coupling the Improved SSA and BPNN effectively overcame the propensity of BPNN to converge to local optima, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of flowing bottom hole pressure in a vertical coalbed methane well. Furthermore, the improved SSA-BPNN model was compared with the Genetic Algorithm-Support Vector Regression (GA-SVR) method and the physical model-based analytical method. The results revealed that the mean absolute percentage errors for these three different models were 1.318%, 4.971%, and 18.156%, respectively. The Improved SSA-BPNN model had the lowest error, and its prediction accuracy significantly improved when the flowing bottom hole pressure was low, demonstrating its higher accuracy and strong applicability. The Improved SSA-BPNN model requires only five input parameters, reducing the complexity of input and calculation parameters. It does not require consideration of the fluid distribution within the wellbore and can cover all stages of drainage, maintaining high accuracy across different pressure ranges.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.02.009
Primary Topic
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on prediction of bottom hole flowing pressure for vertical coalbed methane wells based on improved SSA-BPNN

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
article

Research on prediction of bottom hole flowing pressure for vertical coalbed methane wells based on improved SSA-BPNN

article en

Abstract

Coalbed methane resources are extensively developed using vertical wells, with controlled-pressure and controlled-water drainage systems. The flowing bottom hole pressure is a crucial parameter in the design of drainage schemes and equipment selection. Therefore, it is of great significance to predict the flowing bottom hole pressure for vertical coalbed methane wells. To conveniently and accurately forecast the flowing bottom hole pressure of vertical coalbed methane and guide their pressure control and drainage, a Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) algorithm from the field of machine learning was introduced. Additionally, the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) was improved. These were coupled to establish a forecasting model for flowing bottom hole pressure based on the improved SSA-BPNN approach. Five routinely measured parameters that influence flowing bottom hole pressure were selected as the input parameters for the prediction model, with corresponding bottom hole pressure values as the output parameters. A total of 600 sets of field-measured data were partitioned into training, validation, and testing datasets to develop and validate the forecasting model for vertical coalbed methane wells. The validation set showed that the mean absolute percentage errors for the BPNN model and the Improved SSA-BPNN model on the validation set were 3.10% and 0.53%, respectively. This demonstrated that coupling the Improved SSA and BPNN effectively overcame the propensity of BPNN to converge to local optima, thereby improving the prediction accuracy of flowing bottom hole pressure in a vertical coalbed methane well. Furthermore, the improved SSA-BPNN model was compared with the Genetic Algorithm-Support Vector Regression (GA-SVR) method and the physical model-based analytical method. The results revealed that the mean absolute percentage errors for these three different models were 1.318%, 4.971%, and 18.156%, respectively. The Improved SSA-BPNN model had the lowest error, and its prediction accuracy significantly improved when the flowing bottom hole pressure was low, demonstrating its higher accuracy and strong applicability. The Improved SSA-BPNN model requires only five input parameters, reducing the complexity of input and calculation parameters. It does not require consideration of the fluid distribution within the wellbore and can cover all stages of drainage, maintaining high accuracy across different pressure ranges.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.