Enriched RBP-binding sites and characteristics of subsets of FLEXIs with a binding site for each of the RBPs in Clusters I-VI.

<p>Scatter plots and density plots are shown for FLEXIs with binding sites for each protein in (A) Cluster I, (B) Cluster II, (C) Cluster III, (D) Cluster IV, (E) Cluster V, and (F) Cluster VI. In the scatter plots (left), RBPs whose binding sites were significantly over- or under-represented compared to those for other RBPs in the subset of FLEXIs compared to all other FLEXIs (≥2% abundance, p≤0.05 calculated by Fisher’s exact test and adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) are labeled by name color coded by protein function as shown at the bottom of the Figure. The density distribution plots (right) compare the length, GC content, and MFE for the most stable secondary structure predicted by RNAfold for subsets of FLEXIs with binding sites for each RBP associated with Clusters I to VI (red) compared to all other FLEXIs (black). The number of FLEXIs comprising each subset is indicated in parentheses next to the name of the RBP. p-values are shown at the top left of those density plots in which the distribution for the subset of FLEXIs differed significantly from other FLEXIs (p<0.01 and FDR≤0.05 as determined by 1,000 Monte-Carlo simulations).</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011416.s016
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enriched RBP-binding sites and characteristics of subsets of FLEXIs with a binding site for each of the RBPs in Clusters I-VI.

Figshare
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
article

Enriched RBP-binding sites and characteristics of subsets of FLEXIs with a binding site for each of the RBPs in Clusters I-VI.

article en

Abstract

<p>Scatter plots and density plots are shown for FLEXIs with binding sites for each protein in (A) Cluster I, (B) Cluster II, (C) Cluster III, (D) Cluster IV, (E) Cluster V, and (F) Cluster VI. In the scatter plots (left), RBPs whose binding sites were significantly over- or under-represented compared to those for other RBPs in the subset of FLEXIs compared to all other FLEXIs (≥2% abundance, p≤0.05 calculated by Fisher’s exact test and adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) are labeled by name color coded by protein function as shown at the bottom of the Figure. The density distribution plots (right) compare the length, GC content, and MFE for the most stable secondary structure predicted by RNAfold for subsets of FLEXIs with binding sites for each RBP associated with Clusters I to VI (red) compared to all other FLEXIs (black). The number of FLEXIs comprising each subset is indicated in parentheses next to the name of the RBP. p-values are shown at the top left of those density plots in which the distribution for the subset of FLEXIs differed significantly from other FLEXIs (p<0.01 and FDR≤0.05 as determined by 1,000 Monte-Carlo simulations).</p> <p>(PDF)</p>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.