Macro-micro matching limits of polymer microspheres with pore throats in enhanced oil recovery

Polymer microspheres can continue to migrate through the pore throats by the elastic deformation after plugging pore throats, achieving deep profile control and flooding in reservoirs. The successful application of polymer microspheres hinges on their excellent match with the reservoir, necessitating the study of their macroscopic core scale and microscopic pore-throat scale matching relationships. First, two sizes of polymer microspheres (MG-1 and MG-2) were synthesized, and injectivity experiments were conducted through long different permeability cores with intermediate pressure measurement points. The macroscopic matching characteristics between polymer microspheres and pore throats were identified through the three-stage pressure gradient curve patterns. Second, the pore-throat models were used to carry out microfluidic displacement experiments of polymer microspheres to evaluate the microscopic matching characteristics of polymer microspheres with pore throats based on their entry and retention status in throats at different scales. The matching patterns between polymer microspheres and cores can be divided into three types: end-face plugging, matching, and direct passage. Based on the pressure difference at the ends of the polymer microsphere injection and the subsequent water flooding, the upper limit of the macroscopic matching coefficient between MG-1 and pore throats was determined to be 1.3 to 1.4, with the optimal matching coefficient being 0.8 to 1.0. The microfluidic displacement results show that microspheres need to be under a certain pressure to enter smaller pores and throats. The maximum matching coefficients for MG-1 to enter and retain in cross-sectional and axial models are 1.21 and 1.47, respectively, corresponding to the optimal matching coefficient and upper limit of microscopic matching between MG-1 and pore throats. The macro-micro matching characteristics of polymer microspheres with pore throats are highly consistent. The error is caused by the high-pressure gradient in microfluidic displacement and the end-face effect in core flooding. Considering the macro and micro matching characteristics comprehensively, the optimal matching coefficient for MG-1 with pore throats is around 1.0, with an upper limit of about 1.4. The experimental results show that it is feasible to use microfluidic displacement experiments to replace complex core flooding experiments to evaluate the matching of polymer microspheres with pore throats.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13673/j.pgre.202311028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macro-micro matching limits of polymer microspheres with pore throats in enhanced oil recovery

1 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
article

Macro-micro matching limits of polymer microspheres with pore throats in enhanced oil recovery

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Polymer microspheres can continue to migrate through the pore throats by the elastic deformation after plugging pore throats, achieving deep profile control and flooding in reservoirs. The successful application of polymer microspheres hinges on their excellent match with the reservoir, necessitating the study of their macroscopic core scale and microscopic pore-throat scale matching relationships. First, two sizes of polymer microspheres (MG-1 and MG-2) were synthesized, and injectivity experiments were conducted through long different permeability cores with intermediate pressure measurement points. The macroscopic matching characteristics between polymer microspheres and pore throats were identified through the three-stage pressure gradient curve patterns. Second, the pore-throat models were used to carry out microfluidic displacement experiments of polymer microspheres to evaluate the microscopic matching characteristics of polymer microspheres with pore throats based on their entry and retention status in throats at different scales. The matching patterns between polymer microspheres and cores can be divided into three types: end-face plugging, matching, and direct passage. Based on the pressure difference at the ends of the polymer microsphere injection and the subsequent water flooding, the upper limit of the macroscopic matching coefficient between MG-1 and pore throats was determined to be 1.3 to 1.4, with the optimal matching coefficient being 0.8 to 1.0. The microfluidic displacement results show that microspheres need to be under a certain pressure to enter smaller pores and throats. The maximum matching coefficients for MG-1 to enter and retain in cross-sectional and axial models are 1.21 and 1.47, respectively, corresponding to the optimal matching coefficient and upper limit of microscopic matching between MG-1 and pore throats. The macro-micro matching characteristics of polymer microspheres with pore throats are highly consistent. The error is caused by the high-pressure gradient in microfluidic displacement and the end-face effect in core flooding. Considering the macro and micro matching characteristics comprehensively, the optimal matching coefficient for MG-1 with pore throats is around 1.0, with an upper limit of about 1.4. The experimental results show that it is feasible to use microfluidic displacement experiments to replace complex core flooding experiments to evaluate the matching of polymer microspheres with pore throats.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Xi'an Shiyou University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp (China) (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.