Differential gene expression (DGE) recovery based on pseudobulk data.

We varied training sample size from 20 (25%) to 80 (100%) (x-axis) and quantified area under curve (AUC) for DGE recovery (y-axis) by cell type (columns) for each scenario (rows). cond: raw aggregated read counts were used for DGE analysis of in vitro stimulation with C. albicans after 3 hours (3hCA) vs untreated (UT). batch+cond: same as cond, and with batch (V2 & V3 chemistry) as a covariate in the 3hCA vs UT DGE model. Combat-seq cond: Combat-seq batch-corrected read counts were used in DGE analysis of 3hCA vs UT. DGE analysis was performed in the training and testing samples and restricted to common gene sets predicted by all methods. Each point is the result of one analysis, and three replicates were conducted for each training sample size. For each pseudobulk data, the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC were estimated by FDR fixed at 0.05 in the observed DGE results and varied FDRs from 0 to 1 by 0.05 in the DGE results using imputed expression. Local polynomial regression fitting (loess) were plotted for each approach. Noted that no data is shown for CD19/Combat-Seq cond because the common gene set predicted by all methods equals zero. CIBX-inbuilt: CIBERSORTx with the inbuilt signature matrix; CIBX-custom: CIBERSORTx with a custom signature matrix based on pure cell expression in the training samples; bMIND: bMIND with true fractions; swCAM: swCAM with true fractions; LASSO/ridge: regularised multi-response Gaussian models. (PDF)

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012859.s008
Primary Topic
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential gene expression (DGE) recovery based on pseudobulk data.

Figshare
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
article

Differential gene expression (DGE) recovery based on pseudobulk data.

article en

Abstract

We varied training sample size from 20 (25%) to 80 (100%) (x-axis) and quantified area under curve (AUC) for DGE recovery (y-axis) by cell type (columns) for each scenario (rows). cond: raw aggregated read counts were used for DGE analysis of in vitro stimulation with C. albicans after 3 hours (3hCA) vs untreated (UT). batch+cond: same as cond, and with batch (V2 & V3 chemistry) as a covariate in the 3hCA vs UT DGE model. Combat-seq cond: Combat-seq batch-corrected read counts were used in DGE analysis of 3hCA vs UT. DGE analysis was performed in the training and testing samples and restricted to common gene sets predicted by all methods. Each point is the result of one analysis, and three replicates were conducted for each training sample size. For each pseudobulk data, the receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC were estimated by FDR fixed at 0.05 in the observed DGE results and varied FDRs from 0 to 1 by 0.05 in the DGE results using imputed expression. Local polynomial regression fitting (loess) were plotted for each approach. Noted that no data is shown for CD19/Combat-Seq cond because the common gene set predicted by all methods equals zero. CIBX-inbuilt: CIBERSORTx with the inbuilt signature matrix; CIBX-custom: CIBERSORTx with a custom signature matrix based on pure cell expression in the training samples; bMIND: bMIND with true fractions; swCAM: swCAM with true fractions; LASSO/ridge: regularised multi-response Gaussian models. (PDF)

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.