Can Generative AI be Egalitarian?

The recent explosion of “foundation” generative AI models has been built upon the extensive extraction of value from online sources, often without corresponding reciprocation. This pattern mirrors and intensifies the extractive practices of surveillance capitalism [46], while the potential for enormous profit has challenged technology organizations’ commitments to responsible AI practices, raising significant ethical and societal concerns. However, a promising alternative is emerging: the development of models that rely on content willingly and collaboratively provided by users. This article explores this “egalitarian” approach to generative AI, taking inspiration from the successful model of Wikipedia. We explore the potential implications of this approach for the design, development, and constraints of future foundation models. We argue that such an approach is not only ethically sound but may also lead to models that are more responsive to user needs, more diverse in their training data, and ultimately more aligned with societal values. Furthermore, we explore potential challenges and limitations of this approach, including issues of scalability, quality control, and potential biases inherent in volunteercontributed content.

Publication Details

Journal
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13016/m27jk1-rejn
Primary Topic
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Generative AI be Egalitarian?

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
article

Can Generative AI be Egalitarian?

article en

Abstract

The recent explosion of “foundation” generative AI models has been built upon the extensive extraction of value from online sources, often without corresponding reciprocation. This pattern mirrors and intensifies the extractive practices of surveillance capitalism [46], while the potential for enormous profit has challenged technology organizations’ commitments to responsible AI practices, raising significant ethical and societal concerns. However, a promising alternative is emerging: the development of models that rely on content willingly and collaboratively provided by users. This article explores this “egalitarian” approach to generative AI, taking inspiration from the successful model of Wikipedia. We explore the potential implications of this approach for the design, development, and constraints of future foundation models. We argue that such an approach is not only ethically sound but may also lead to models that are more responsive to user needs, more diverse in their training data, and ultimately more aligned with societal values. Furthermore, we explore potential challenges and limitations of this approach, including issues of scalability, quality control, and potential biases inherent in volunteercontributed content.

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Generative AI be Egalitarian? · Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS