Stella Kramrisch, Sanskrit Texts and the Transcultural Project of Indic ‘Naturalism’

Stella Kramrisch’s 1924 English translation of the first printed Sanskrit text of the Citrasūtra (from Viṣṇudharmottara Purāṇa, 5th–9th century CE) made its mark on the nascent stage of art history and high nationalism in India. While translating this ancient treatise on Indian painting, she laid open a possibility of theorizing around Indic naturalism. Her ethics of listening to the text and its mimetic terminology is heroic at a time when her contemporary art historian, A. K. Coomaraswamy, had taken pains to expungenaturalism from Indian art history as an alien framework. Revisiting Kramrisch’s translation today from the lens of transculturalism reveals her model of comparativism between western and Indian naturalism. It is particularly legible where Kramrisch confronted the most corrupt part of the text. My essay examines Kramrisch’s ‘cultural unconscious’ via these ‘mistranslations’ while exploring how her keen ethics of listening complicate the recent move towards decolonizing Indian art history.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11588/xxi.2024.4.107513
Primary Topic
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stella Kramrisch, Sanskrit Texts and the Transcultural Project of Indic ‘Naturalism’

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
article

Stella Kramrisch, Sanskrit Texts and the Transcultural Project of Indic ‘Naturalism’

article en

Abstract

Stella Kramrisch’s 1924 English translation of the first printed Sanskrit text of the Citrasūtra (from Viṣṇudharmottara Purāṇa, 5th–9th century CE) made its mark on the nascent stage of art history and high nationalism in India. While translating this ancient treatise on Indian painting, she laid open a possibility of theorizing around Indic naturalism. Her ethics of listening to the text and its mimetic terminology is heroic at a time when her contemporary art historian, A. K. Coomaraswamy, had taken pains to expungenaturalism from Indian art history as an alien framework. Revisiting Kramrisch’s translation today from the lens of transculturalism reveals her model of comparativism between western and Indian naturalism. It is particularly legible where Kramrisch confronted the most corrupt part of the text. My essay examines Kramrisch’s ‘cultural unconscious’ via these ‘mistranslations’ while exploring how her keen ethics of listening complicate the recent move towards decolonizing Indian art history.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.