Analysis of Environmental Footprint of Bovine Upholstery Leather by Using Life Cycle Assessment

Given the increasing emphasis on ‘dual carbon’ goals and the emergence of product environmental footprints/carbon footprints as international trade barriers, the evaluation of the environmental impacts of leather products using life cycle assessment (LCA) has become imperative. In this study, the LCA method and self-developed life cycle inventory databases for leather chemicals and Chinese cow hides were used to assess the environmental footprint, including the carbon footprint of bovine upholstery leather. Additionally, the study analyzed the contributions of various inventory data, including raw hides, leather chemicals, energy consumption during leather production, upstream transportation, waste treatment, and packaging materials, to the overall environmental impacts. The result of global warming potential (GWP) indicator of bovine upholstery leather was 11.6 kg CO2 eq/m2 of finished leather, with raw hides contributing a substantial 79.6%. The contribution of the remaining inventory data (excluding raw hides) was only 2.4 kg CO2 eq/m2 of finished leather. The result of primary energy demand indicator of upholstery leather was 73.8 MJ/m2 of finished leather, with the contributions from chemicals, energy consumption during leather production, and raw hides accounting for 39.4%, 30.6%, and 24.6%, respectively. The result of water use indicator of upholstery leather amounts to 907.9 kg/m2 of finished leather, with raw hides contributing the majority (93.2%). The result of ecotoxicity indicator of upholstery leather was 56.3 CTUe/m2 of finished leather, showing a close relationship with the quantity of chromium tanning agents used. Thus, improving the resource utilization rate of raw hides is key to achieving green and low-carbon manufacturing of leather products.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12472/j.issn.1004-7964.202500002
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Environmental Footprint of Bovine Upholstery Leather by Using Life Cycle Assessment

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
article

Analysis of Environmental Footprint of Bovine Upholstery Leather by Using Life Cycle Assessment

article en

Abstract

Given the increasing emphasis on ‘dual carbon’ goals and the emergence of product environmental footprints/carbon footprints as international trade barriers, the evaluation of the environmental impacts of leather products using life cycle assessment (LCA) has become imperative. In this study, the LCA method and self-developed life cycle inventory databases for leather chemicals and Chinese cow hides were used to assess the environmental footprint, including the carbon footprint of bovine upholstery leather. Additionally, the study analyzed the contributions of various inventory data, including raw hides, leather chemicals, energy consumption during leather production, upstream transportation, waste treatment, and packaging materials, to the overall environmental impacts. The result of global warming potential (GWP) indicator of bovine upholstery leather was 11.6 kg CO2 eq/m2 of finished leather, with raw hides contributing a substantial 79.6%. The contribution of the remaining inventory data (excluding raw hides) was only 2.4 kg CO2 eq/m2 of finished leather. The result of primary energy demand indicator of upholstery leather was 73.8 MJ/m2 of finished leather, with the contributions from chemicals, energy consumption during leather production, and raw hides accounting for 39.4%, 30.6%, and 24.6%, respectively. The result of water use indicator of upholstery leather amounts to 907.9 kg/m2 of finished leather, with raw hides contributing the majority (93.2%). The result of ecotoxicity indicator of upholstery leather was 56.3 CTUe/m2 of finished leather, showing a close relationship with the quantity of chromium tanning agents used. Thus, improving the resource utilization rate of raw hides is key to achieving green and low-carbon manufacturing of leather products.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sichuan University (CN), China Leather and Footwear Industry Research Institute (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Environmental Footprint of Bovine Upholstery Leather by Using Life Cycle Assessment · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS