Measuring the Magnetic Anisotropy of Metal–Metal\nMultiple Bonds: The Importance of Correcting for Ligand Effects

We\ndescribe the synthesis and characterization of the quadruply-bonded\ndimer Mo<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>2</sub>NMe<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> in which each molybdenum(II) center is bound to two chelating\nboranatodimethylaminomethyl (BDAM) ligands. The BDAM anions bind to\nthe metal at one end by a metal–carbon σ bond and at\nthe other by a three-center M–H–B interaction. Each\nBDAM ligand chelates to a single Mo atom so that the metal–metal\nbond is unbridged; the Mo–Mo distance is 2.114(2) Å. Structural\nand solution NMR data, analyzed via McConnell’s equation and\nsupported by DFT calculations, show that the magnetic anisotropies\nassociated with highly polarizable and π-bonding ligands (such\nas chloride groups and aryl rings) can greatly affect the NMR chemical\nshifts of reporter groups, so that ignoring their contributions leads\nto significant overestimates of the anisotropy due just to the metal–metal\nbond. We propose a method to quantify and correct for the magnetic\nanisotropy effects arising from the ligands. Application of this method\nto Mo<sub>2</sub>(BDAM)<sub>4</sub> indicates that the magnetic anisotropy\nof the Mo–Mo quadruple bond in this molecule is about −800\n× 10<sup>–36</sup> m<sup>3</sup> molecule<sup>–1</sup>. Anisotropies significantly higher than this value (as sometimes\nreported in the prior literature) are most likely incorrect.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c02329.s001
Primary Topic
Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Magnetic Anisotropy of Metal–Metal\nMultiple Bonds: The Importance of Correcting for Ligand Effects

Figshare
Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
article

Measuring the Magnetic Anisotropy of Metal–Metal\nMultiple Bonds: The Importance of Correcting for Ligand Effects

article en

Abstract

We\ndescribe the synthesis and characterization of the quadruply-bonded\ndimer Mo<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>2</sub>NMe<sub>2</sub>BH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> in which each molybdenum(II) center is bound to two chelating\nboranatodimethylaminomethyl (BDAM) ligands. The BDAM anions bind to\nthe metal at one end by a metal–carbon σ bond and at\nthe other by a three-center M–H–B interaction. Each\nBDAM ligand chelates to a single Mo atom so that the metal–metal\nbond is unbridged; the Mo–Mo distance is 2.114(2) Å. Structural\nand solution NMR data, analyzed via McConnell’s equation and\nsupported by DFT calculations, show that the magnetic anisotropies\nassociated with highly polarizable and π-bonding ligands (such\nas chloride groups and aryl rings) can greatly affect the NMR chemical\nshifts of reporter groups, so that ignoring their contributions leads\nto significant overestimates of the anisotropy due just to the metal–metal\nbond. We propose a method to quantify and correct for the magnetic\nanisotropy effects arising from the ligands. Application of this method\nto Mo<sub>2</sub>(BDAM)<sub>4</sub> indicates that the magnetic anisotropy\nof the Mo–Mo quadruple bond in this molecule is about −800\n× 10<sup>–36</sup> m<sup>3</sup> molecule<sup>–1</sup>. Anisotropies significantly higher than this value (as sometimes\nreported in the prior literature) are most likely incorrect.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.