Morphology,Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structureof Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and SurfactantFormulation

Transmission microscopy and microRaman imaging are used to investigate the morphologies, growth process, and porous structure of methane hydrate promoted by two prototypical surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt (AOT). Large ranges of surfactant concentrations and subcooling are considered from 100 to 1500 ppmw and 1 to 10 K. Gas hydrates are generated on the guest/water interface as hollow crystallites. These crystallites expand into the aqueous phase from their (open) basis on the interface until they detach from it to form a slurry and ultimately a porous structure, whose pores are filled with the aqueous phase. The morphologies and growth rates of those crystallites and the structure (porosity and pore sizes) of the porous medium are characterized as a function of subcooling and surfactant formulation. Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. Under low-to-moderate subcooling (from 2 to 4 K), the crystallites are hollow spikes or cones, growing at a rate that increases with subcooling. Under high subcooling (>4 K), tiny (micronic or submicronic) crystallites are massively produced at the interface. The porosity and pore sizes of the resulting porous structure decrease with increasing subcooling, down to values in the range of 40–50% and a few microns for the highest subcooling investigated (≈10 K). Rather than altering the kinetics of hydrate formation, the surfactant prevents the aggregation of hydrate crystallites on the interface as an impermeable crust and/or at the rear of the interface, thus allowing the back-flow of water and the continuous production of hydrate crystallites. In other words, the surfactant ensures the flowability of the slurry of hydrate crystallites and its removal away from the interface. These phenomena are primarily driven by the interfacial properties of the water/gas/hydrate system.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06253.s001
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morphology,Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structureof Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and SurfactantFormulation

Figshare
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Morphology,Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structureof Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and SurfactantFormulation

article en

Abstract

Transmission microscopy and microRaman imaging are used to investigate the morphologies, growth process, and porous structure of methane hydrate promoted by two prototypical surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt (AOT). Large ranges of surfactant concentrations and subcooling are considered from 100 to 1500 ppmw and 1 to 10 K. Gas hydrates are generated on the guest/water interface as hollow crystallites. These crystallites expand into the aqueous phase from their (open) basis on the interface until they detach from it to form a slurry and ultimately a porous structure, whose pores are filled with the aqueous phase. The morphologies and growth rates of those crystallites and the structure (porosity and pore sizes) of the porous medium are characterized as a function of subcooling and surfactant formulation. Under low subcooling (≈1 K), the hydrate crystallites are hollow cylinders, whose diameters decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. Under low-to-moderate subcooling (from 2 to 4 K), the crystallites are hollow spikes or cones, growing at a rate that increases with subcooling. Under high subcooling (>4 K), tiny (micronic or submicronic) crystallites are massively produced at the interface. The porosity and pore sizes of the resulting porous structure decrease with increasing subcooling, down to values in the range of 40–50% and a few microns for the highest subcooling investigated (≈10 K). Rather than altering the kinetics of hydrate formation, the surfactant prevents the aggregation of hydrate crystallites on the interface as an impermeable crust and/or at the rear of the interface, thus allowing the back-flow of water and the continuous production of hydrate crystallites. In other words, the surfactant ensures the flowability of the slurry of hydrate crystallites and its removal away from the interface. These phenomena are primarily driven by the interfacial properties of the water/gas/hydrate system.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Morphology,Growth Kinetics, and Porous Structureof Surfactant-Promoted Gas Hydrates: Roles of Subcooling and SurfactantFormulation · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS