Preparation and Comparison\nof Merit Parameters of\nHydrophobic Membranes on Metal Meshes Based on ZIF-8/PVDF and In Situ\nFormation of ZIF‑8 by Secondary Growth and Electrochemical\nSynthesis

Several hydrophobic membranes based on zeolitic imidazolate\nframework-8\n(ZIF-8) on metallic meshes were prepared and compared. To assess whether\nthe incorporation of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) would help improve\nmerit parameters of the membranes for oil/water separation applications,\ntwo kinds of membranes were synthesized: polymeric membranes using\nPVDF and nonpolymeric membranes, determining and comparing their wettability,\nnonpolar liquid flow, and critical water intrusion pressure. Additionally,\nthe interface of ZIF-8/PVDF was investigated through computational\nsimulations. The simulations predict excellent adhesion between ZIF-8\nand PVDF, without the presence of interfacial cavities or microvoids.\nThe adsorption isotherms of benzene, toluene, and <i>m</i>-xylene (BTXs) on PVDF-ZIF-8 composites were calculated, indicating\nthat BTXs are selectively adsorbed on ZIF-8 with negligible incorporation\ninto the polymer phase, while ZIF-8 retains its high adsorption capacity\nin the composite. Encouraged by the computational results, several\nZIF-8-PVDF membranes were prepared on metal meshes through three different\nsynthesis strategies, referred to as immersion, spray, and sprinkling.\nMoreover, two nonpolymeric type of membranes were prepared for comparison\nas well, obtained by the <i>in situ</i> synthesis of ZIF-8\non the meshes, referred to as secondary growth and electrochemical\nanchoring. The static water-contact angle in air, the flux of organic\nliquids, and the critical inclusion pressure of water were measured\nand compared for the five methods. When globally analyzed, it is clear\nthat the more hydrophobic the membrane, the higher the water pressure\nit supports but at the cost of reducing the fluxes. The largest values\nof water pressure were obtained for a ZIF-8/PVDF membrane made with\nthe sprinkling method, which consists of a solid dispersion of ZIF-8\non top of a PVDF coating, identified as a very promising preparation\nprocedure.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.4c02014.s001
Primary Topic
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparation and Comparison\nof Merit Parameters of\nHydrophobic Membranes on Metal Meshes Based on ZIF-8/PVDF and In Situ\nFormation of ZIF‑8 by Secondary Growth and Electrochemical\nSynthesis

Figshare
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
article

Preparation and Comparison\nof Merit Parameters of\nHydrophobic Membranes on Metal Meshes Based on ZIF-8/PVDF and In Situ\nFormation of ZIF‑8 by Secondary Growth and Electrochemical\nSynthesis

article en

Abstract

Several hydrophobic membranes based on zeolitic imidazolate\nframework-8\n(ZIF-8) on metallic meshes were prepared and compared. To assess whether\nthe incorporation of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) would help improve\nmerit parameters of the membranes for oil/water separation applications,\ntwo kinds of membranes were synthesized: polymeric membranes using\nPVDF and nonpolymeric membranes, determining and comparing their wettability,\nnonpolar liquid flow, and critical water intrusion pressure. Additionally,\nthe interface of ZIF-8/PVDF was investigated through computational\nsimulations. The simulations predict excellent adhesion between ZIF-8\nand PVDF, without the presence of interfacial cavities or microvoids.\nThe adsorption isotherms of benzene, toluene, and <i>m</i>-xylene (BTXs) on PVDF-ZIF-8 composites were calculated, indicating\nthat BTXs are selectively adsorbed on ZIF-8 with negligible incorporation\ninto the polymer phase, while ZIF-8 retains its high adsorption capacity\nin the composite. Encouraged by the computational results, several\nZIF-8-PVDF membranes were prepared on metal meshes through three different\nsynthesis strategies, referred to as immersion, spray, and sprinkling.\nMoreover, two nonpolymeric type of membranes were prepared for comparison\nas well, obtained by the <i>in situ</i> synthesis of ZIF-8\non the meshes, referred to as secondary growth and electrochemical\nanchoring. The static water-contact angle in air, the flux of organic\nliquids, and the critical inclusion pressure of water were measured\nand compared for the five methods. When globally analyzed, it is clear\nthat the more hydrophobic the membrane, the higher the water pressure\nit supports but at the cost of reducing the fluxes. The largest values\nof water pressure were obtained for a ZIF-8/PVDF membrane made with\nthe sprinkling method, which consists of a solid dispersion of ZIF-8\non top of a PVDF coating, identified as a very promising preparation\nprocedure.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.