Bubble flow analysis using multi-phase field method

In simulations of gas-liquid two-phase flows using conventional interface capture methods, we observed that when bubbles come close to each other, they tend to merge numerically, despite experimental evidence indicating that they would repel each other. Given the significant impact of sequential numerical coalescence on flow patterns, it is necessary to regulate the merging behavior of close bubbles. To address this issue, we introduced the Multi-Phase Field (MPF) method, which mitigates bubble coalescence by applying an independent fluid fraction function to each bubble. In this study, we employed the MPF based on the N-phase model [7] to minimize numerical errors associated with surface interactions at triple junction points. Additionally, we implemented the Ordered Active Parameter Tracking (OAPT) method [9] to efficiently store several hundreds of fluid fraction functions. To validate the MPF method, we conducted analysis of turbulent bubbly pipe flows and compared the results against experimental data from Colin et al [12]. The validation results showed reasonable agreements with respect to the bubble distribution and the flow velocity profiles.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430203002/pdf
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bubble flow analysis using multi-phase field method

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Bubble flow analysis using multi-phase field method

article en

Abstract

In simulations of gas-liquid two-phase flows using conventional interface capture methods, we observed that when bubbles come close to each other, they tend to merge numerically, despite experimental evidence indicating that they would repel each other. Given the significant impact of sequential numerical coalescence on flow patterns, it is necessary to regulate the merging behavior of close bubbles. To address this issue, we introduced the Multi-Phase Field (MPF) method, which mitigates bubble coalescence by applying an independent fluid fraction function to each bubble. In this study, we employed the MPF based on the N-phase model [7] to minimize numerical errors associated with surface interactions at triple junction points. Additionally, we implemented the Ordered Active Parameter Tracking (OAPT) method [9] to efficiently store several hundreds of fluid fraction functions. To validate the MPF method, we conducted analysis of turbulent bubbly pipe flows and compared the results against experimental data from Colin et al [12]. The validation results showed reasonable agreements with respect to the bubble distribution and the flow velocity profiles.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bubble flow analysis using multi-phase field method · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS