Comparative Analysis of Supercapacitors vs. Batteries

This paper presents a comparative analysis of supercapacitors and batteries as energy storage technologies, focusing on key performance metrics such as energy storage capacity, power output, efficiency, and charge/discharge cycles. Supercapacitors are known for their rapid charge and discharge capabilities, high power density, and longevity, making them ideal for applications requiring quick bursts of energy. Conversely, batteries, particularly lithium-ion, offer significantly higher energy density, enabling them to store more energy in a compact form factor, but they suffer from longer charging times and limited cycle life. This study highlights the trade-offs between the two technologies, providing insights into their suitability for various applications, from consumer electronics to renewable energy systems. The findings suggest that while supercapacitors excel in scenarios demanding high power and durability, batteries remain the preferred choice for applications requiring higher energy storage capacity. The analysis underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate energy storage solution based on specific application requirements.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459101010/pdf
Primary Topic
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Supercapacitors vs. Batteries

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
article

Comparative Analysis of Supercapacitors vs. Batteries

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of supercapacitors and batteries as energy storage technologies, focusing on key performance metrics such as energy storage capacity, power output, efficiency, and charge/discharge cycles. Supercapacitors are known for their rapid charge and discharge capabilities, high power density, and longevity, making them ideal for applications requiring quick bursts of energy. Conversely, batteries, particularly lithium-ion, offer significantly higher energy density, enabling them to store more energy in a compact form factor, but they suffer from longer charging times and limited cycle life. This study highlights the trade-offs between the two technologies, providing insights into their suitability for various applications, from consumer electronics to renewable energy systems. The findings suggest that while supercapacitors excel in scenarios demanding high power and durability, batteries remain the preferred choice for applications requiring higher energy storage capacity. The analysis underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate energy storage solution based on specific application requirements.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Supercapacitors vs. Batteries · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS