P–P Coupling <i>with</i> and <i>without</i> Terminal Metal–PhosphorusIntermediates

Terminal metal–phosphorus (M–P) complexes are of significant contemporary interest as potential platforms for P-atom transfer (PAT) chemistry. Decarbonylation of metal–phosphaethynolate (M–PCO) complexes has emerged as a general synthetic approach to terminal M–P complexes. M–P complexes that are stabilized by strong M–P multiple bonds are kinetically persistent and isolable. In the absence of strong M–P stabilization, the formation of diphosphorus-bridged complexes (i.e., M–P–P–M species) is often interpreted as evidence for the intermediacy of reactive, unobserved M–P species. Here, we demonstrate that while diphosphorus complexes can arise from reactive M–P species, P–P coupling can also proceed directly from M–PCO species without the intermediacy of M–P complexes. Photochemical decarbonylations of a pincer-supported Ni (II)–PCO complex at 77 K afford a spectroscopically observed terminal Ni–P complex, which is best described as a triplet, Ni(II)-metallophosphinidene with two unpaired electrons localized on the atomic phosphorus ligand. Thermal annealing of this transient Ni–P complex results in rapid dimerization to afford the corresponding P<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>-bridged dinickel complex. Unexpectedly, the same P<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>-bridged dinickel complex can also be accessed via a thermally promoted process in the absence of light. The analysis of reaction kinetics, isotope-labeling studies, and computational results indicate that the thermal P–P coupling process proceeds via a noncanonical mechanism that avoids terminal M–P intermediates. Together, these results represent the first observation of P–P coupling from characterized terminal M–P species and demonstrate that terminal M–P intermediates are not required to obtain P–P coupling products. These observations provide critical mechanistic understanding of the activation modes relevant to P-atom transfer.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c16833.s001
Primary Topic
Peanut Plant Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P–P Coupling with and without Terminal Metal–PhosphorusIntermediates

Figshare
Peanut Plant Research Studies
article

P–P Coupling with and without Terminal Metal–PhosphorusIntermediates

article en

Abstract

Terminal metal–phosphorus (M–P) complexes are of significant contemporary interest as potential platforms for P-atom transfer (PAT) chemistry. Decarbonylation of metal–phosphaethynolate (M–PCO) complexes has emerged as a general synthetic approach to terminal M–P complexes. M–P complexes that are stabilized by strong M–P multiple bonds are kinetically persistent and isolable. In the absence of strong M–P stabilization, the formation of diphosphorus-bridged complexes (i.e., M–P–P–M species) is often interpreted as evidence for the intermediacy of reactive, unobserved M–P species. Here, we demonstrate that while diphosphorus complexes can arise from reactive M–P species, P–P coupling can also proceed directly from M–PCO species without the intermediacy of M–P complexes. Photochemical decarbonylations of a pincer-supported Ni (II)–PCO complex at 77 K afford a spectroscopically observed terminal Ni–P complex, which is best described as a triplet, Ni(II)-metallophosphinidene with two unpaired electrons localized on the atomic phosphorus ligand. Thermal annealing of this transient Ni–P complex results in rapid dimerization to afford the corresponding P<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>-bridged dinickel complex. Unexpectedly, the same P<sub>2</sub><sup>2–</sup>-bridged dinickel complex can also be accessed via a thermally promoted process in the absence of light. The analysis of reaction kinetics, isotope-labeling studies, and computational results indicate that the thermal P–P coupling process proceeds via a noncanonical mechanism that avoids terminal M–P intermediates. Together, these results represent the first observation of P–P coupling from characterized terminal M–P species and demonstrate that terminal M–P intermediates are not required to obtain P–P coupling products. These observations provide critical mechanistic understanding of the activation modes relevant to P-atom transfer.

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Peanut Plant Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.