The Significant\nDifferences in Solvation Thermodynamics\nof C1–C3 Oxygenates in Hydrophilic versus Hydrophobic Pores\nof a Hydrophilic Ti-FAU Zeolite Model

The rates of catalytic reactions have been observed to\nbe dramatically\ndifferent in zeolites, depending on whether they are hydrophobic or\nhydrophilic. Hypotheses aimed at explaining this behavior have pointed\nto various solvent and zeolite properties as having an influence on\nentropy. Herein, the influence of various solvent and adsorbate properties\non the solvation energies, entropies, and free energies of 11 C<sub>1</sub>–C<sub>3</sub> oxygenates in hydrophobic and hydrophilic\npores within a hydrophilic model of Ti-FAU zeolite is tested. The\nresults indicate significant variation in the solvation thermodynamics\ndepending on the adsorbate type as well as if it is bound within a\nhydrophobic or hydrophilic pore. Further, while solvation energies\nare related to solvent–adsorbate interactions, solvation entropies\nhave multiple contributions, and these differ depending on whether\nthe adsorbate is in a hydrophobic or hydrophilic pore. Specifically,\nsolvation entropies in hydrophobic pores are related to solvent structural\nproperties, whereas solvation entropies in hydrophilic pores are related\nto adsorbate polarity. The large range of results obtained from two\ndifferent pores within one zeolite model with minimal unique adsorption\nsites suggests that solvation behavior in zeolites is complicated\nand that the phenomena that control the observed performance depend\non the zeolite, reaction, and solvent.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04596.s001
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Significant\nDifferences in Solvation Thermodynamics\nof C1–C3 Oxygenates in Hydrophilic versus Hydrophobic Pores\nof a Hydrophilic Ti-FAU Zeolite Model

Figshare
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

The Significant\nDifferences in Solvation Thermodynamics\nof C1–C3 Oxygenates in Hydrophilic versus Hydrophobic Pores\nof a Hydrophilic Ti-FAU Zeolite Model

article en

Abstract

The rates of catalytic reactions have been observed to\nbe dramatically\ndifferent in zeolites, depending on whether they are hydrophobic or\nhydrophilic. Hypotheses aimed at explaining this behavior have pointed\nto various solvent and zeolite properties as having an influence on\nentropy. Herein, the influence of various solvent and adsorbate properties\non the solvation energies, entropies, and free energies of 11 C<sub>1</sub>–C<sub>3</sub> oxygenates in hydrophobic and hydrophilic\npores within a hydrophilic model of Ti-FAU zeolite is tested. The\nresults indicate significant variation in the solvation thermodynamics\ndepending on the adsorbate type as well as if it is bound within a\nhydrophobic or hydrophilic pore. Further, while solvation energies\nare related to solvent–adsorbate interactions, solvation entropies\nhave multiple contributions, and these differ depending on whether\nthe adsorbate is in a hydrophobic or hydrophilic pore. Specifically,\nsolvation entropies in hydrophobic pores are related to solvent structural\nproperties, whereas solvation entropies in hydrophilic pores are related\nto adsorbate polarity. The large range of results obtained from two\ndifferent pores within one zeolite model with minimal unique adsorption\nsites suggests that solvation behavior in zeolites is complicated\nand that the phenomena that control the observed performance depend\non the zeolite, reaction, and solvent.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Significant\nDifferences in Solvation Thermodynamics\nof C1–C3 Oxygenates in Hydrophilic versus Hydrophobic Pores\nof a Hydrophilic Ti-FAU Zeolite Model · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS