Bilevel Optimization\nfor Capacity Contingency Debottlenecking\nConsidering Trade-Offs within the Waste Oil Supply Chain

A bilevel\noptimization model is developed to synthesize an optimal\nwaste oil recycling supply chain design in economic and environmental\naspects while considering its overall resiliency in addressing major\ndisruptions. In the upper level, optimal re-refineries selection is\ndetermined based on the cost and emissions, while the “n-1”\ncontingency is incorporated in the subsequent level to identify the\nproduction capacity required for each re-refinery to ensure the functionality\nof supply chains under disruption. Two regional case studies, comprising\nthe East Malaysia and West Malaysia, are presented to evaluate the\neffectiveness of the “n-1” contingency strategy. The\neconomic viability of applying “n-1” is different for\nboth cases. Considering a one-month disruption across the asset lifespan,\nthe model anticipates a positive economic gain of 15.79% (in East\nMalaysia) and 85.71% (in West Malaysia). Nevertheless, applying “n-1”\ncontingency demonstrates better environmental performances in both\ncases as compared to cases without “n-1”.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02539.s001
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilevel Optimization\nfor Capacity Contingency Debottlenecking\nConsidering Trade-Offs within the Waste Oil Supply Chain

Figshare
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Bilevel Optimization\nfor Capacity Contingency Debottlenecking\nConsidering Trade-Offs within the Waste Oil Supply Chain

article en

Abstract

A bilevel\noptimization model is developed to synthesize an optimal\nwaste oil recycling supply chain design in economic and environmental\naspects while considering its overall resiliency in addressing major\ndisruptions. In the upper level, optimal re-refineries selection is\ndetermined based on the cost and emissions, while the “n-1”\ncontingency is incorporated in the subsequent level to identify the\nproduction capacity required for each re-refinery to ensure the functionality\nof supply chains under disruption. Two regional case studies, comprising\nthe East Malaysia and West Malaysia, are presented to evaluate the\neffectiveness of the “n-1” contingency strategy. The\neconomic viability of applying “n-1” is different for\nboth cases. Considering a one-month disruption across the asset lifespan,\nthe model anticipates a positive economic gain of 15.79% (in East\nMalaysia) and 85.71% (in West Malaysia). Nevertheless, applying “n-1”\ncontingency demonstrates better environmental performances in both\ncases as compared to cases without “n-1”.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.