Properties of NoO\nand YbO

Bond dissociation energies (BDEs) and spectroscopic parameters\nfor the ground states of YbO and NoO were calculated at the Brueckner\ndoubles (BD(T)) level and for NoO at the coupled cluster CCSD(T) level\nbased on the closed-shell configurations Yb<sup>2+</sup>(4f<sup>14</sup>)O<sup>2–</sup>(2p<sup>6</sup>) and No<sup>2+</sup>(5f<sup>14</sup>)O<sup>2–</sup>(2p<sup>6</sup>). For YbO, the BD(T)\nBDE (3.93 eV) and vibrational frequency (686.3 cm<sup>–1</sup>) are consistent with the experiment; the BD(T) bond distance was\n1.8492 Å, about 0.04 Å longer than the experiment. For NoO,\nthe calculated BDEs are 3.07 eV (BD(T)) and 3.08 eV (CCSD(T)) and\nare expected to be good to ±3 kcal/mol (±0.13 eV). Potential\nenergy curves (PECs) for the spin–orbit (Ω) states associated\nwith the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> configurations of YbO and NoO\nwere calculated at the SA-CASSCF/SO-CASPT2/aQ-DK level. PECs considering\nboth the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> and f<sup>14</sup> configurations\nwere calculated at this level, as the ground states are expected to\ncontain both configurations. Due to a bias in the SA-CASSCF to the\nf<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> configurations, the f<sup>14</sup> configurations\ncould not be properly described simultaneously with the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> ones. The natural population analysis based on the\nnatural bond orbitals shows that YbO and NoO are quite ionic, with\n5d orbitals being more important in YbO than the 6d orbitals in NoO.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07245.s001
Primary Topic
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Properties of NoO\nand YbO

Figshare
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
article

Properties of NoO\nand YbO

article en

Abstract

Bond dissociation energies (BDEs) and spectroscopic parameters\nfor the ground states of YbO and NoO were calculated at the Brueckner\ndoubles (BD(T)) level and for NoO at the coupled cluster CCSD(T) level\nbased on the closed-shell configurations Yb<sup>2+</sup>(4f<sup>14</sup>)O<sup>2–</sup>(2p<sup>6</sup>) and No<sup>2+</sup>(5f<sup>14</sup>)O<sup>2–</sup>(2p<sup>6</sup>). For YbO, the BD(T)\nBDE (3.93 eV) and vibrational frequency (686.3 cm<sup>–1</sup>) are consistent with the experiment; the BD(T) bond distance was\n1.8492 Å, about 0.04 Å longer than the experiment. For NoO,\nthe calculated BDEs are 3.07 eV (BD(T)) and 3.08 eV (CCSD(T)) and\nare expected to be good to ±3 kcal/mol (±0.13 eV). Potential\nenergy curves (PECs) for the spin–orbit (Ω) states associated\nwith the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> configurations of YbO and NoO\nwere calculated at the SA-CASSCF/SO-CASPT2/aQ-DK level. PECs considering\nboth the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> and f<sup>14</sup> configurations\nwere calculated at this level, as the ground states are expected to\ncontain both configurations. Due to a bias in the SA-CASSCF to the\nf<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> configurations, the f<sup>14</sup> configurations\ncould not be properly described simultaneously with the f<sup>13</sup>s<sup>1</sup> ones. The natural population analysis based on the\nnatural bond orbitals shows that YbO and NoO are quite ionic, with\n5d orbitals being more important in YbO than the 6d orbitals in NoO.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Properties of NoO\nand YbO · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS