Comparison of numerical results of RSM turbulence models for the problem of asymmetrical plane diffuser

Fundamental processes of turbulent flow separation have long presented a significant challenge for developers of numerical turbulence models. The main difficulty lies in reproducing these processes with a high degree of accuracy, which is largely due to the limited availability of experimental data necessary for model verification. The lack of an extensive experimental database hinders the verification and optimization of computational models of turbulent flow. Studies of the behavior of turbulent flow in an asymmetric flat diffuser were carried out by several independent researchers, among whom we can note the works of Obi et al., as well as Buis. In particular, the experimental data obtained by Buis are widely used as a standard for comparison with the results of numerical simulations. These data allow us to evaluate the accuracy of various turbulence models in describing complex processes of flow separation and recovery. Currently, several types of models based on the second-order closure equations (RSM) have been developed: RSM S-omega, RSM BLS and RSM Linear L-S. Each of these models has its own characteristics, which allows us to evaluate their efficiency under various flow conditions. This paper examines the ability of RSM models to accurately determine key turbulent flow characteristics such as flow detachment and reattachment locations. Accurately identifying these zones is critical to modeling turbulent flow in a flat asymmetric diffuser, as it affects pressure, flow velocity, and flow stability.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202414503036/pdf
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of numerical results of RSM turbulence models for the problem of asymmetrical plane diffuser

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Comparison of numerical results of RSM turbulence models for the problem of asymmetrical plane diffuser

article en

Abstract

Fundamental processes of turbulent flow separation have long presented a significant challenge for developers of numerical turbulence models. The main difficulty lies in reproducing these processes with a high degree of accuracy, which is largely due to the limited availability of experimental data necessary for model verification. The lack of an extensive experimental database hinders the verification and optimization of computational models of turbulent flow. Studies of the behavior of turbulent flow in an asymmetric flat diffuser were carried out by several independent researchers, among whom we can note the works of Obi et al., as well as Buis. In particular, the experimental data obtained by Buis are widely used as a standard for comparison with the results of numerical simulations. These data allow us to evaluate the accuracy of various turbulence models in describing complex processes of flow separation and recovery. Currently, several types of models based on the second-order closure equations (RSM) have been developed: RSM S-omega, RSM BLS and RSM Linear L-S. Each of these models has its own characteristics, which allows us to evaluate their efficiency under various flow conditions. This paper examines the ability of RSM models to accurately determine key turbulent flow characteristics such as flow detachment and reattachment locations. Accurately identifying these zones is critical to modeling turbulent flow in a flat asymmetric diffuser, as it affects pressure, flow velocity, and flow stability.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.