PHOTON AND NEUTRON SHIELDING COMPETENCE OF SnO<sub>2</sub> – REINFORCED WITH 22Na<sub>2</sub>O – 15B<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> – 45P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> – (18 - X) K<sub>2</sub>O BIOACTIVE GLASSES.

Background: Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) has favorable photon shielding properties due to its high atomic number (Z), which enables effective attenuation of gamma rays and X-rays. When incorporated into bioactive glasses, SnO2 dopants enhance the overall photon shielding performance of the composite material. The high Z of Sn (Z=50) assists in attenuating the photons through photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production mechanisms. Objective: The research is to assess photon and neutron shielding competence of SnO2- reinforced 22Na2O –15B2O3 –45P2O5 – (18 – x) K2O – xSnO2 (NBPK) (x = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Mol% ) bioactive glasses for better radiation shielding. Methods: In this study, the melt quenching process is assumed in making the glass system 22Na2O –15B2O3 – 45P2O5 – (18 – x) K2O – xSnO2, x = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mol %) using NH4H2PO4, H3BO4, Na2CO3, K2CO3 [12]. Computational approach was applied to estimate for each value of x. The nominal compositions of the prepared glasses were given as S1-S6 and was run in the WinXCOM software. The XCOM code is a database for calculating mass attenuation coefficients at different photon energies [11, 13].The obtained value from WinXCOM (S1-S6) were transported to excel for further calculations and thereby taken to the origin software for graph plotting. Results: The result of the simulation shows that as energy changes, the Mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) values of all the glass samples change in a similar way. As a result, the MAC values tend to be in the order of S1 &lt; S2 &lt; S3 &lt; S4 &lt; S5 &lt; S6 for the majority of the energy spectrum. S1-S6's LAC maximums were 0.08, 0.45, 0.59, 0.71, 0.80, and 0.92, respectively. The greatest HVT was acquired for all glass tests with values 65.56, 13.28, 11.18, 10.26, 9.81, and 9.16 cm for S1-S6 accordingly. Conclusion: The calculated radiation interaction parameters revealed that S6 outperformed the other five bioactive glasses in this study as a photon, proton, and neutron absorber. In general, photon shielding applications may benefit more from the studied bioactive glasses than conventional concrete.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JRRS
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82547/jrrs.vol37no2.14
Primary Topic
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PHOTON AND NEUTRON SHIELDING COMPETENCE OF SnO2 – REINFORCED WITH 22Na2O – 15B2O3 – 45P2O5 – (18 - X) K2O BIOACTIVE GLASSES.

JRRS
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
article

PHOTON AND NEUTRON SHIELDING COMPETENCE OF SnO2 – REINFORCED WITH 22Na2O – 15B2O3 – 45P2O5 – (18 - X) K2O BIOACTIVE GLASSES.

article en

Abstract

Background: Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) has favorable photon shielding properties due to its high atomic number (Z), which enables effective attenuation of gamma rays and X-rays. When incorporated into bioactive glasses, SnO2 dopants enhance the overall photon shielding performance of the composite material. The high Z of Sn (Z=50) assists in attenuating the photons through photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production mechanisms. Objective: The research is to assess photon and neutron shielding competence of SnO2- reinforced 22Na2O –15B2O3 –45P2O5 – (18 – x) K2O – xSnO2 (NBPK) (x = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Mol% ) bioactive glasses for better radiation shielding. Methods: In this study, the melt quenching process is assumed in making the glass system 22Na2O –15B2O3 – 45P2O5 – (18 – x) K2O – xSnO2, x = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mol %) using NH4H2PO4, H3BO4, Na2CO3, K2CO3 [12]. Computational approach was applied to estimate for each value of x. The nominal compositions of the prepared glasses were given as S1-S6 and was run in the WinXCOM software. The XCOM code is a database for calculating mass attenuation coefficients at different photon energies [11, 13].The obtained value from WinXCOM (S1-S6) were transported to excel for further calculations and thereby taken to the origin software for graph plotting. Results: The result of the simulation shows that as energy changes, the Mass attenuation coefficient (MAC) values of all the glass samples change in a similar way. As a result, the MAC values tend to be in the order of S1 &lt; S2 &lt; S3 &lt; S4 &lt; S5 &lt; S6 for the majority of the energy spectrum. S1-S6's LAC maximums were 0.08, 0.45, 0.59, 0.71, 0.80, and 0.92, respectively. The greatest HVT was acquired for all glass tests with values 65.56, 13.28, 11.18, 10.26, 9.81, and 9.16 cm for S1-S6 accordingly. Conclusion: The calculated radiation interaction parameters revealed that S6 outperformed the other five bioactive glasses in this study as a photon, proton, and neutron absorber. In general, photon shielding applications may benefit more from the studied bioactive glasses than conventional concrete.

JRRS
Federal University of Technology Owerri (NG), Nasarawa State University (NG)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.