Modeling and Comparative\nAnalysis of CO<sub>2</sub> Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and\nThermochemical Carbon\nCapture Systems

Deployment of post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture\ntechnologies is needed to reduce emissions from power and industrial\nsources. Comparisons between existing thermochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture methods and emerging electrochemical concepts can help contextualize\nthe promise of these new approaches. Here, we investigate the required\nabsorber sizes for three capture systems: amine scrubbing using monoethanolamine\n(MEA), direct electrochemical (redox-active sorbent), and indirect\nelectrochemical (pH swing). For the electrochemical systems, we study\nhow column size varies as a function of molecular properties and operating\nconditions, finding that parameters most closely related to CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rates (i.e., rate constants and p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>) have the greatest impact. Through a Monte Carlo analysis,\nwe find that the direct process can be designed to have column sizes\nsimilar to the thermochemical process; however, the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rate in the indirect process is too slow to enable smaller\ncolumns. Broadly, this work connects system input parameters to absorber\nperformance for electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture and provides\na foundation for techno-economic and engineering analyses.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01523.s001
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and Comparative\nAnalysis of CO2 Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and\nThermochemical Carbon\nCapture Systems

Figshare
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Modeling and Comparative\nAnalysis of CO2 Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and\nThermochemical Carbon\nCapture Systems

article en

Abstract

Deployment of post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture\ntechnologies is needed to reduce emissions from power and industrial\nsources. Comparisons between existing thermochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture methods and emerging electrochemical concepts can help contextualize\nthe promise of these new approaches. Here, we investigate the required\nabsorber sizes for three capture systems: amine scrubbing using monoethanolamine\n(MEA), direct electrochemical (redox-active sorbent), and indirect\nelectrochemical (pH swing). For the electrochemical systems, we study\nhow column size varies as a function of molecular properties and operating\nconditions, finding that parameters most closely related to CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rates (i.e., rate constants and p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>) have the greatest impact. Through a Monte Carlo analysis,\nwe find that the direct process can be designed to have column sizes\nsimilar to the thermochemical process; however, the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake rate in the indirect process is too slow to enable smaller\ncolumns. Broadly, this work connects system input parameters to absorber\nperformance for electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> capture and provides\na foundation for techno-economic and engineering analyses.

Figshare
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling and Comparative\nAnalysis of CO<sub>2</sub> Absorption Columns in Electrochemical and\nThermochemical Carbon\nCapture Systems · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS