Energy Analysisof Electrofiltration in a HomogeneousMacroporous α‑Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Membrane

Membrane filtration offers high-quality permeate at the cost of energy-intensive mechanical pumping. Electrofiltration, or electric field-assisted water permeation, has shown promise in reducing energy expenses, eliminating mechanical components, and providing instantaneous flow reversal for membrane defouling. However, fundamental analysis of the energy consumption, energy efficiency, defined as the specific energy consumption, SEC, and standardized nomenclature hinders development. Using a sintered random loose packing of monodisperse α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> spheres to create a well-defined geometry, microstructure, and composition, we investigated electroosmotic flow through the membrane to evaluate the SEC of components within an electrofiltration membrane. At minimal transmembrane pressure and compared to no electric field, application of an electrical potential, ΔΦ, of 10 V (pressure difference of 1.2 kPa, pH 3.8, and 22 °C) increased the membrane flux 15-fold from the initial 2–31 LMH. The observed energy consumption with the well-defined physical membrane properties and net electroosmotic flow (EOF) of 29 LMH resulted in SEC<sub>EOF</sub> = 0.31 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>. A fundamental determination of the theoretical minimum SEC, SEC<sub>EOF</sub><sup>min</sup>, is estimated to be 0.006 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>. While the SEC<sub>EOF</sub> determined is efficient for traditional membrane filtration and literature reported SEC<sub>EOF</sub>, the SEC<sub>EOF</sub> in this study is ascribed almost entirely to electrode losses and ionic transport resistance. These energy losses indicate significant opportunities to improve energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtrations. This quantitative evaluation identifies electrofiltration performance and reasons for energy loss within an EOF system, which may be further studied to improve the energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtration.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.4c00768.s001
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Analysisof Electrofiltration in a HomogeneousMacroporous α‑Al2O3 Membrane

Figshare
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
article

Energy Analysisof Electrofiltration in a HomogeneousMacroporous α‑Al2O3 Membrane

article en

Abstract

Membrane filtration offers high-quality permeate at the cost of energy-intensive mechanical pumping. Electrofiltration, or electric field-assisted water permeation, has shown promise in reducing energy expenses, eliminating mechanical components, and providing instantaneous flow reversal for membrane defouling. However, fundamental analysis of the energy consumption, energy efficiency, defined as the specific energy consumption, SEC, and standardized nomenclature hinders development. Using a sintered random loose packing of monodisperse α-Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> spheres to create a well-defined geometry, microstructure, and composition, we investigated electroosmotic flow through the membrane to evaluate the SEC of components within an electrofiltration membrane. At minimal transmembrane pressure and compared to no electric field, application of an electrical potential, ΔΦ, of 10 V (pressure difference of 1.2 kPa, pH 3.8, and 22 °C) increased the membrane flux 15-fold from the initial 2–31 LMH. The observed energy consumption with the well-defined physical membrane properties and net electroosmotic flow (EOF) of 29 LMH resulted in SEC<sub>EOF</sub> = 0.31 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>. A fundamental determination of the theoretical minimum SEC, SEC<sub>EOF</sub><sup>min</sup>, is estimated to be 0.006 kWh/m<sup>3</sup>. While the SEC<sub>EOF</sub> determined is efficient for traditional membrane filtration and literature reported SEC<sub>EOF</sub>, the SEC<sub>EOF</sub> in this study is ascribed almost entirely to electrode losses and ionic transport resistance. These energy losses indicate significant opportunities to improve energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtrations. This quantitative evaluation identifies electrofiltration performance and reasons for energy loss within an EOF system, which may be further studied to improve the energy efficiency of electric field-assisted filtration.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy Analysisof Electrofiltration in a HomogeneousMacroporous α‑Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Membrane · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS