Governing Decentralised Finance

ABSTRACT The decentralised finance (DeFi) industry hosts billions of dollars in cryptocurrency deposits across protocols that autonomously and independently execute financial transactions. However, little is known about how these protocols raise capital or conduct their governance. This paper examines the token distribution mechanisms of the top‐50 DeFi protocols and documents significant variation in how tokens are allocated to users, investors and developers. We find that several protocols distribute a greater share of tokens to insiders, such as through private sales and developer allocations, rather than to users via incentives and airdrops. We present evidence that protocols with greater insider control exhibit fewer deposits, lower token values, and increased risk. Using an event‐study analysis, we find significant increases in protocol deposits post‐airdrops. Our results suggest that DeFi users prefer user‐centric governance models and are sensitive to the risks of insider control. Lastly, this paper discusses the risks and challenges of DeFi governance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3157
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Decentralised Finance

International Journal of Finance & Economics
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Governing Decentralised Finance

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The decentralised finance (DeFi) industry hosts billions of dollars in cryptocurrency deposits across protocols that autonomously and independently execute financial transactions. However, little is known about how these protocols raise capital or conduct their governance. This paper examines the token distribution mechanisms of the top‐50 DeFi protocols and documents significant variation in how tokens are allocated to users, investors and developers. We find that several protocols distribute a greater share of tokens to insiders, such as through private sales and developer allocations, rather than to users via incentives and airdrops. We present evidence that protocols with greater insider control exhibit fewer deposits, lower token values, and increased risk. Using an event‐study analysis, we find significant increases in protocol deposits post‐airdrops. Our results suggest that DeFi users prefer user‐centric governance models and are sensitive to the risks of insider control. Lastly, this paper discusses the risks and challenges of DeFi governance.

International Journal of Finance & EconomicsVol. 31(1)
Arkansas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.