Atomic Cu<sup>2+</sup> Clusters vs Single Cu<sup>2+</sup> Atoms as Optimal Cocatalystson NaTaO<sub>3</sub> for Enhanced Noble-Metal-FreeH<sub>2</sub>O/H<sub>2</sub> Photocatalysis

Engineering of single-atom catalysts (SACs) or subnanoclusters (SnCs) as cocatalysts is a powerful strategy for enhancing photocatalytic performance. However, a more concrete understanding of the role of SAC vs SnC remains a challenge. A prerequisite to achieving this task is a systematic selective synthesis of SACs and SnCs as cocatalysts for a given process. Herein, we have employed a modified flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) process for deposition of either single Cu<sup>2+</sup> atoms or Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters on NaTaO<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles, producing a library of Cu(SAC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> or Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> with controlled amounts of Cu(SAC) and Cu(SnC), respectively. <i>In situ</i> Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was used as a state-of-the-art tool to map the precise configuration of the Cu<sup>2+</sup> species on NaTaO<sub>3</sub>, as well as the photoinduced electron transfer from NaTaO<sub>3</sub> to surface-anchored Cu<sup>2+</sup>. Photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub> production from H<sub>2</sub>O demonstrates that Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> i.e. decorated with Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters, exhibits significantly superior activity vs their single Cu-atom counterpart, achieving enhanced H<sub>2</sub> photogeneration of >10,900 μmol/g/h, corresponding to an apparent quantum yield of 1.5%, with no noble metal added as a cocatalyst. EPR data show that Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters in Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> are ∼300% more efficient electron acceptors compared to Cu<sup>2+</sup> monomers in Cu(SAC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub>. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data reveal that FSP-deposited Cu<sup>2+</sup> SnC forms a tight interface with the NaTaO<sub>3</sub> surface, leading to an improved energy-level configuration. Overall, the present data showcase, for this particular photocatalytic system, that Cu subnanoclusters rather than the currently believed single Cu atoms are the preferable cocatalyst in H<sub>2</sub>O photocatalysis by NaTaO<sub>3</sub>. This postulate probably can be verified for other pertinent systems. Moreover, we demonstrate that FSP-made Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> is a highly promising, noble-metal-free photocatalyst.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c03183.s001
Primary Topic
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atomic Cu2+ Clusters vs Single Cu2+ Atoms as Optimal Cocatalystson NaTaO3 for Enhanced Noble-Metal-FreeH2O/H2 Photocatalysis

Figshare
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
article

Atomic Cu2+ Clusters vs Single Cu2+ Atoms as Optimal Cocatalystson NaTaO3 for Enhanced Noble-Metal-FreeH2O/H2 Photocatalysis

article en

Abstract

Engineering of single-atom catalysts (SACs) or subnanoclusters (SnCs) as cocatalysts is a powerful strategy for enhancing photocatalytic performance. However, a more concrete understanding of the role of SAC vs SnC remains a challenge. A prerequisite to achieving this task is a systematic selective synthesis of SACs and SnCs as cocatalysts for a given process. Herein, we have employed a modified flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) process for deposition of either single Cu<sup>2+</sup> atoms or Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters on NaTaO<sub>3</sub> nanoparticles, producing a library of Cu(SAC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> or Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> with controlled amounts of Cu(SAC) and Cu(SnC), respectively. <i>In situ</i> Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was used as a state-of-the-art tool to map the precise configuration of the Cu<sup>2+</sup> species on NaTaO<sub>3</sub>, as well as the photoinduced electron transfer from NaTaO<sub>3</sub> to surface-anchored Cu<sup>2+</sup>. Photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub> production from H<sub>2</sub>O demonstrates that Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> i.e. decorated with Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters, exhibits significantly superior activity vs their single Cu-atom counterpart, achieving enhanced H<sub>2</sub> photogeneration of >10,900 μmol/g/h, corresponding to an apparent quantum yield of 1.5%, with no noble metal added as a cocatalyst. EPR data show that Cu<sup>2+</sup> subnanoclusters in Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> are ∼300% more efficient electron acceptors compared to Cu<sup>2+</sup> monomers in Cu(SAC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub>. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data reveal that FSP-deposited Cu<sup>2+</sup> SnC forms a tight interface with the NaTaO<sub>3</sub> surface, leading to an improved energy-level configuration. Overall, the present data showcase, for this particular photocatalytic system, that Cu subnanoclusters rather than the currently believed single Cu atoms are the preferable cocatalyst in H<sub>2</sub>O photocatalysis by NaTaO<sub>3</sub>. This postulate probably can be verified for other pertinent systems. Moreover, we demonstrate that FSP-made Cu(SnC)@NaTaO<sub>3</sub> is a highly promising, noble-metal-free photocatalyst.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.