Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm

\nMembrane oxygenator failure remains a concern for perfusion teams. Successful outcomes for this low-frequency, high-risk intervention are predicated on having written institutional protocols for both the oxygenator change-out procedure as well as how often the procedure is practiced by staff perfusionists. A recent review of peer-reviewed journal articles, textbooks and online resources revealed a lack of a unified intervention algorithm for failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While an oxygenator change-out procedure may still be considered the gold standard for a confirmed device failure, temporizing measures exist that, in select cases, can afford time to the clinical team and even obviate the need for an oxygenator change-out procedure. We now consider the venous piggyback technique sourcing blood from the venous limb of the circuit a first-line intervention to afford enhanced patient safety while the clinical team decides on required interventions when oxygenator failure presents during CPB.\n

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024026/pdf
Primary Topic
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
article

Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm

article en

Abstract

\nMembrane oxygenator failure remains a concern for perfusion teams. Successful outcomes for this low-frequency, high-risk intervention are predicated on having written institutional protocols for both the oxygenator change-out procedure as well as how often the procedure is practiced by staff perfusionists. A recent review of peer-reviewed journal articles, textbooks and online resources revealed a lack of a unified intervention algorithm for failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). While an oxygenator change-out procedure may still be considered the gold standard for a confirmed device failure, temporizing measures exist that, in select cases, can afford time to the clinical team and even obviate the need for an oxygenator change-out procedure. We now consider the venous piggyback technique sourcing blood from the venous limb of the circuit a first-line intervention to afford enhanced patient safety while the clinical team decides on required interventions when oxygenator failure presents during CPB.\n

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Failure to oxygenate during cardiopulmonary bypass; treatment options and intervention algorithm · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS