An explainable decision model for selecting facility locations in supply chain networks

Suitable facility location selection for customer-required capacity localization is an emerging topic in semiconductor supply chain management. However, this topic has not been thoroughly investigated. For this reason, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-interpreted fuzzy group decision-making (FGDM) approach is proposed in this study to assist a wafer foundry company in selecting suitable facility locations for customer-required capacity localization. The XAI-interpreted FGDM approach aims to overcome the shortcomings of existing visualization tools and techniques for explaining the facility location selection process. To this end, several new visualization tools and methods have been proposed, including hanging gradient bar charts, gradient bidirectional scatterplots, and hanging gradient bar charts for traceable aggregation. After applying the XAI-interpreted FGDM approach to a real case, the new XAI tools enhanced the explainability of the facility location selection process and results. The advantage over the existing XAI tools was up to 36 %. In addition, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis results showed that the factors that impact the assessment results most may be inconsistent with the original judgments of domain experts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supply Chain Analytics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100148
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An explainable decision model for selecting facility locations in supply chain networks

4 citations
Supply Chain Analytics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
article

An explainable decision model for selecting facility locations in supply chain networks

article en
4 citations

Abstract

Suitable facility location selection for customer-required capacity localization is an emerging topic in semiconductor supply chain management. However, this topic has not been thoroughly investigated. For this reason, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-interpreted fuzzy group decision-making (FGDM) approach is proposed in this study to assist a wafer foundry company in selecting suitable facility locations for customer-required capacity localization. The XAI-interpreted FGDM approach aims to overcome the shortcomings of existing visualization tools and techniques for explaining the facility location selection process. To this end, several new visualization tools and methods have been proposed, including hanging gradient bar charts, gradient bidirectional scatterplots, and hanging gradient bar charts for traceable aggregation. After applying the XAI-interpreted FGDM approach to a real case, the new XAI tools enhanced the explainability of the facility location selection process and results. The advantage over the existing XAI tools was up to 36 %. In addition, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis results showed that the factors that impact the assessment results most may be inconsistent with the original judgments of domain experts.

Supply Chain AnalyticsVol. 11
Chaoyang University of Technology (TW), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Feng Chia University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An explainable decision model for selecting facility locations in supply chain networks · Supply Chain Analytics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS