Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder

Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently. The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models. Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90], <i>p</i> = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82], <i>p</i> &lt; .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] −$2,182 [−$4,206, −$69], <i>p</i> = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (−$1,511 [−$2,330, −$615], <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs. This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use. Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients. Data were analyzed from 838 adults taking antidepressants with an additional (adjunctive) therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). We found that patients receiving cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower rates of hospitalizations and lower mental health-related costs per year after starting treatment compared with patients who started a different adjunctive treatment before cariprazine. Thus, starting cariprazine earlier in MDD treatment was linked to lower healthcare resource use and cost savings.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28256056.v2
Primary Topic
Peanut Plant Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder

Figshare
Peanut Plant Research Studies
article

Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder

article en

Abstract

Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently. The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models. Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90], <i>p</i> = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82], <i>p</i> &lt; .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] −$2,182 [−$4,206, −$69], <i>p</i> = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (−$1,511 [−$2,330, −$615], <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs. This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use. Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients. Data were analyzed from 838 adults taking antidepressants with an additional (adjunctive) therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). We found that patients receiving cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower rates of hospitalizations and lower mental health-related costs per year after starting treatment compared with patients who started a different adjunctive treatment before cariprazine. Thus, starting cariprazine earlier in MDD treatment was linked to lower healthcare resource use and cost savings.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Peanut Plant Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.