Simultaneous linear equating for scenarios with optional test versions or across multiple alternative anchors

This paper proposes an extension of linear equating that may be useful in one of two fairly common assessment scenarios. One is where different students have taken different combinations of test forms. This might occur, for example, where students have some free choice over the exam papers they take within a particular qualification. In this scenario we wish to transform scores on the all the various test forms to a common scale so that scores can be used interchangeably. A second scenario is where, perhaps for reasons of security, we use more than one anchor test between test forms with different students exposed to different anchors. In this second scenario, we wish to equate test forms using all of the data from different anchor versions in a coherent manner. The method proposed in this paper to address the above scenarios may be particularly useful in instances where the alternative of using item response theory is problematic.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/pare.2087
Primary Topic
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous linear equating for scenarios with optional test versions or across multiple alternative anchors

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
article

Simultaneous linear equating for scenarios with optional test versions or across multiple alternative anchors

article en

Abstract

This paper proposes an extension of linear equating that may be useful in one of two fairly common assessment scenarios. One is where different students have taken different combinations of test forms. This might occur, for example, where students have some free choice over the exam papers they take within a particular qualification. In this scenario we wish to transform scores on the all the various test forms to a common scale so that scores can be used interchangeably. A second scenario is where, perhaps for reasons of security, we use more than one anchor test between test forms with different students exposed to different anchors. In this second scenario, we wish to equate test forms using all of the data from different anchor versions in a coherent manner. The method proposed in this paper to address the above scenarios may be particularly useful in instances where the alternative of using item response theory is problematic.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Cambridge University Press (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Simultaneous linear equating for scenarios with optional test versions or across multiple alternative anchors · University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS