Development and evaluation of clinically effective “APOE Genotyping PCR‐based assay kit” in Alzheimer’s Disease patients

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer’s disease treatment drug “Lecanemab” has been approved in the US, Japan, and China, and administration has begun in clinical treatment. Other anti‐Aβ antibody drugs (e.g., Donanemab) with the same mechanism of action are also being developed. Adverse effect of Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) has been reported and the incidence of ARIA varies by genotype (van Dyck et al, N Engl J Med 2023). In the US and Japan, it is recommended that APOE genotyping tests should be performed more than protein phenotyping for predicting the risk of ARIA, and there is a strong clinical need for quality‐assured test. We have developed a rapid, high‐throughput, quality‐controlled PCR testing method that can achieve low costs that will help reduce medical costs. METHOD: This assay detects two SNPs in two sites including the GC‐rich region associated with the risk of ARIA, which previously required two PCR assays. By designing of primer/probe sequences and Tm value control and PCR cycle conditions, all six APOE genotypes could be classified with one assay. To evaluate the clinical utility of this assay, we conducted an evaluation using DNA samples derived from whole blood specimens in which APOE genotype was determined. RESULT: In this APOE genotyping assay, the number of assays was reduced from 2 to 1, and results could be reported in approximately 100 minutes per PCR run by a simple and low‐cost PCR‐based assay. In the clinical evaluation, a total of 130 samples were tested, and the APOE genotype concordance rate for all 6 types (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4) was 100% and compared to the reference method, Sanger sequencing. CONCLUSION: The newly developed assay was confirmed that it is a low‐cost and high‐throughput PCR‐based assay and can accurately determine the six genotypes. In the future, it is expected that this assay will be widely used to determine the risk of ARIA before administering anti‐Aβ antibody drugs. We will also report on sample quality and points to consider required for APOE genotyping.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed Central
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095484
Primary Topic
Plant Pathogens and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and evaluation of clinically effective “APOE Genotyping PCR‐based assay kit” in Alzheimer’s Disease patients

PubMed Central
Plant Pathogens and Resistance
article

Development and evaluation of clinically effective “APOE Genotyping PCR‐based assay kit” in Alzheimer’s Disease patients

article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Alzheimer’s disease treatment drug “Lecanemab” has been approved in the US, Japan, and China, and administration has begun in clinical treatment. Other anti‐Aβ antibody drugs (e.g., Donanemab) with the same mechanism of action are also being developed. Adverse effect of Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) has been reported and the incidence of ARIA varies by genotype (van Dyck et al, N Engl J Med 2023). In the US and Japan, it is recommended that APOE genotyping tests should be performed more than protein phenotyping for predicting the risk of ARIA, and there is a strong clinical need for quality‐assured test. We have developed a rapid, high‐throughput, quality‐controlled PCR testing method that can achieve low costs that will help reduce medical costs. METHOD: This assay detects two SNPs in two sites including the GC‐rich region associated with the risk of ARIA, which previously required two PCR assays. By designing of primer/probe sequences and Tm value control and PCR cycle conditions, all six APOE genotypes could be classified with one assay. To evaluate the clinical utility of this assay, we conducted an evaluation using DNA samples derived from whole blood specimens in which APOE genotype was determined. RESULT: In this APOE genotyping assay, the number of assays was reduced from 2 to 1, and results could be reported in approximately 100 minutes per PCR run by a simple and low‐cost PCR‐based assay. In the clinical evaluation, a total of 130 samples were tested, and the APOE genotype concordance rate for all 6 types (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4) was 100% and compared to the reference method, Sanger sequencing. CONCLUSION: The newly developed assay was confirmed that it is a low‐cost and high‐throughput PCR‐based assay and can accurately determine the six genotypes. In the future, it is expected that this assay will be widely used to determine the risk of ARIA before administering anti‐Aβ antibody drugs. We will also report on sample quality and points to consider required for APOE genotyping.

PubMed Central
Sysmex (Japan) (JP), Niigata University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Plant Pathogens and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and evaluation of clinically effective “APOE Genotyping PCR‐based assay kit” in Alzheimer’s Disease patients · PubMed Central (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS