The Effect of Phase-In Tariffs on Import Growth

This paper estimates the causal effect of phase-in tariffs on import growth for the 12 preferential trade agreements (PTAs) signed by the United States since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The phase-in hypothesis from Baier and Bergstrand (2007) implies that products with gradual tariff decreases should experience gradual import growth. Using recently available PTA tariff data, we extend the work of Besedes et al. (2020) and utilize a tripledifference empirical strategy to provide additional evidence that import growth is not consistent with the phase-in hypothesis. We show that phase-in tariffs do not necessarily yield additional import growth relative to already duty-free products. The analysis documents the average effect of phase-in tariffs and country-specific estimates, highlighting the rich heterogeneity in the response of imports. We also consider both the intensive and extensive margins of import changes by explicitly accounting for zero trade flows.

Publication Details

Journal
Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71476/3r21-te02
Primary Topic
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Phase-In Tariffs on Import Growth

Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
article

The Effect of Phase-In Tariffs on Import Growth

article en

Abstract

This paper estimates the causal effect of phase-in tariffs on import growth for the 12 preferential trade agreements (PTAs) signed by the United States since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The phase-in hypothesis from Baier and Bergstrand (2007) implies that products with gradual tariff decreases should experience gradual import growth. Using recently available PTA tariff data, we extend the work of Besedes et al. (2020) and utilize a tripledifference empirical strategy to provide additional evidence that import growth is not consistent with the phase-in hypothesis. We show that phase-in tariffs do not necessarily yield additional import growth relative to already duty-free products. The analysis documents the average effect of phase-in tariffs and country-specific estimates, highlighting the rich heterogeneity in the response of imports. We also consider both the intensive and extensive margins of import changes by explicitly accounting for zero trade flows.

Staff Working Papers: U.S. International Trade Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Pasture and Agricultural Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.