Fragility and its dimensions: an analysis methodology in support of local development policies

The research explores different aspects of spatial fragility. It develops a GIS-based methodology that aims to synthesize fragility indicators implemented in order to build analytical validation and support tools for planning at different administrative levels. Three main themes concerning environmental, socioeconomic and relational issues are considered in order to integrate fragility assessment into planning practices. Thus, an alternative to approaches often based on one-dimensional criteria is proposed. By relating different datasets, the study constructs composite indicators through a non-compensatory synthetic index, enabling a multidimensional understanding of spatial dynamics. The research does not focus on classifying areas, but rather on understanding the nuances of fragility and how it manifests itself at the spatial scale. The attempt is thus to theorize an analytical tool useful in identifying spatial homogeneities and differences, enhancing the understanding of fragility by promoting integrated planning strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6093/2284-4732/11759
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fragility and its dimensions: an analysis methodology in support of local development policies

Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Fragility and its dimensions: an analysis methodology in support of local development policies

article en

Abstract

The research explores different aspects of spatial fragility. It develops a GIS-based methodology that aims to synthesize fragility indicators implemented in order to build analytical validation and support tools for planning at different administrative levels. Three main themes concerning environmental, socioeconomic and relational issues are considered in order to integrate fragility assessment into planning practices. Thus, an alternative to approaches often based on one-dimensional criteria is proposed. By relating different datasets, the study constructs composite indicators through a non-compensatory synthetic index, enabling a multidimensional understanding of spatial dynamics. The research does not focus on classifying areas, but rather on understanding the nuances of fragility and how it manifests itself at the spatial scale. The attempt is thus to theorize an analytical tool useful in identifying spatial homogeneities and differences, enhancing the understanding of fragility by promoting integrated planning strategies.

Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.