Additional file 1 of Comparative effectiveness of different types of female condoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary Fig. 1. Network Diagram for outcomes assess A) Clinical breakage B) non-clinical breakage, and C) Total Breakage (Each node represents an intervention tested in the trials, with the size of the nodes corresponding to the number of patients who received the intervention. The thickness of the connecting lines reflects the number of trials conducted). Supplementary Fig. 2. Network Diagram for outcomes assess A) invagination B) Slippage C) Misdirection (Each node represents an intervention tested in the trials, with the size of the nodes corresponding to the number of patients who received the intervention. The thickness of the connecting lines reflects the number of trials conducted). Supplementary Fig. 3. Forest plot for outcomes assess A) invagination B) Slippage C) Misdirection. Supplementary Fig. 4. Forest plot for outcomes assesses A) discomfort B) itching C) rash.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29622817
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional file 1 of Comparative effectiveness of different types of female condoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Figshare
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Additional file 1 of Comparative effectiveness of different types of female condoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

article en

Abstract

Supplementary Material 1: Supplementary Fig. 1. Network Diagram for outcomes assess A) Clinical breakage B) non-clinical breakage, and C) Total Breakage (Each node represents an intervention tested in the trials, with the size of the nodes corresponding to the number of patients who received the intervention. The thickness of the connecting lines reflects the number of trials conducted). Supplementary Fig. 2. Network Diagram for outcomes assess A) invagination B) Slippage C) Misdirection (Each node represents an intervention tested in the trials, with the size of the nodes corresponding to the number of patients who received the intervention. The thickness of the connecting lines reflects the number of trials conducted). Supplementary Fig. 3. Forest plot for outcomes assess A) invagination B) Slippage C) Misdirection. Supplementary Fig. 4. Forest plot for outcomes assesses A) discomfort B) itching C) rash.

Figshare
Cairo University (EG), University of California, Irvine (US), Al-Quds University (PS), University of Rwanda (RW), Al-Azhar University (ID), Alexandria University (EG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Additional file 1 of Comparative effectiveness of different types of female condoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS