Bodies, Biopolitics and Biometrics: Refugee/Asylum Seeker Management in the Digital Humanitarian Age

Governments, humanitarian organizations, and private actors have increasingly relied on digital surveillance technologies including biometrics to manage refugee populations. Using a novel theoretical framework which combines Agamben’s bare life, Foucault’s biopolitics, and Heek’s “adverse digital incorporation” this paper analyzes increasing securitization in humanitarian spaces through the normalisation of biometric surveillance. This paper introduces the concept of “biopolitical creep” to analyse how humanitarianism’s innovation has normalized digital technology’s expansion and securitized migration management- promoting refugee exploitation. Evaluating the UNHCR’s biometric management of refugees in Bangladesh and the US government’s increase of surveillance capacities targeting asylum seekers, the paper explores how technology designed for humanitarian spaces reinforces and encourages securitization of migration. Rapid uptake of these technologies raises questions of surveillance, data ownership, humanitarian ethics and power relations between various actors. The paper concludes by outlining points for further study, reevaluating the relationship between humanitarian actors and technology that closely monitors individuals.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Houghton St Press
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82191/lseidr.116
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bodies, Biopolitics and Biometrics: Refugee/Asylum Seeker Management in the Digital Humanitarian Age

Houghton St Press
Global Security and Public Health
article

Bodies, Biopolitics and Biometrics: Refugee/Asylum Seeker Management in the Digital Humanitarian Age

article en

Abstract

Governments, humanitarian organizations, and private actors have increasingly relied on digital surveillance technologies including biometrics to manage refugee populations. Using a novel theoretical framework which combines Agamben’s bare life, Foucault’s biopolitics, and Heek’s “adverse digital incorporation” this paper analyzes increasing securitization in humanitarian spaces through the normalisation of biometric surveillance. This paper introduces the concept of “biopolitical creep” to analyse how humanitarianism’s innovation has normalized digital technology’s expansion and securitized migration management- promoting refugee exploitation. Evaluating the UNHCR’s biometric management of refugees in Bangladesh and the US government’s increase of surveillance capacities targeting asylum seekers, the paper explores how technology designed for humanitarian spaces reinforces and encourages securitization of migration. Rapid uptake of these technologies raises questions of surveillance, data ownership, humanitarian ethics and power relations between various actors. The paper concludes by outlining points for further study, reevaluating the relationship between humanitarian actors and technology that closely monitors individuals.

Houghton St Press
Laser Scan Engineering (United Kingdom) (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bodies, Biopolitics and Biometrics: Refugee/Asylum Seeker Management in the Digital Humanitarian Age · Houghton St Press (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS