Possible Welfare Benefits of a Basic Income Support: Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in South Africa

The study investigates the potential welfare effect of basic income support in reducing poverty and inequality in South Africa. Using the 2017 labour force survey and a benefit incidence analysis, we consider three basic income support scenarios: i) universal income support for those aged between 18 and 59; ii) only those who are unemployed receive the benefit; and iii) only unemployed individuals in extremely poor households defined by the food poverty line receive the benefit. Results show that basic income support can reduce poverty and inequality. However, the specific effects of the basic income support will depend on the targeting scenario considered. The universal basic income support is more costly and has higher leakage, with more benefits going to the non-poor. However, this universal support has the biggest overall impact on poverty and inequality reduction because more South Africans receive income support under this scenario. Meanwhile, targeting only the unemployed and the impoverished makes the basic income support more pro-poor and progressive, as well as mitigating the leakage of the benefit to the non-poor. This scenario would however require that an appropriate targeting mechanism is in place.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERSA Working Paper Series
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71587/w9mbg970
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Possible Welfare Benefits of a Basic Income Support: Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in South Africa

ERSA Working Paper Series
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Possible Welfare Benefits of a Basic Income Support: Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in South Africa

article en

Abstract

The study investigates the potential welfare effect of basic income support in reducing poverty and inequality in South Africa. Using the 2017 labour force survey and a benefit incidence analysis, we consider three basic income support scenarios: i) universal income support for those aged between 18 and 59; ii) only those who are unemployed receive the benefit; and iii) only unemployed individuals in extremely poor households defined by the food poverty line receive the benefit. Results show that basic income support can reduce poverty and inequality. However, the specific effects of the basic income support will depend on the targeting scenario considered. The universal basic income support is more costly and has higher leakage, with more benefits going to the non-poor. However, this universal support has the biggest overall impact on poverty and inequality reduction because more South Africans receive income support under this scenario. Meanwhile, targeting only the unemployed and the impoverished makes the basic income support more pro-poor and progressive, as well as mitigating the leakage of the benefit to the non-poor. This scenario would however require that an appropriate targeting mechanism is in place.

ERSA Working Paper Series
Sol Plaatje University (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.