Assessing on-farm experimentation value propositions, processes, and principles: A Norwegian pasture case study

This paper provides a succinct methodology for reporting on the On-Farm Experimentation (OFE) initiatives used here for a Norwegian case study that investigated machinery improvements for pasture soils. This study was based on 10 interviews with the main participants. These were from a local machinery company, a technology start-up, Norway?s major agricultural research institution, a large agronomic services provider, and the farmers who hosted experiments. The results include (i) a breakdown of expected value propositions with points of contention, (ii) strengths and weaknesses of the processes involved, and (iii) scoring against the six major OFE principles. We discuss how this OFE project exemplifies key global issues in research practice calling for new agronomy, and we argue that room for exchanges must be made within projects to achieve farmer-centricity and solve enduring issues; however, beyond any individual effort or process fault, constraints lie with scientific institutional settings that do not incentivize researchers to conduct farmer-centric research.

Publication Details

Journal
eCommons (Cornell University)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7298/ds08-6e43
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Farm Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing on-farm experimentation value propositions, processes, and principles: A Norwegian pasture case study

eCommons (Cornell University)
Agriculture and Farm Safety
article

Assessing on-farm experimentation value propositions, processes, and principles: A Norwegian pasture case study

article en

Abstract

This paper provides a succinct methodology for reporting on the On-Farm Experimentation (OFE) initiatives used here for a Norwegian case study that investigated machinery improvements for pasture soils. This study was based on 10 interviews with the main participants. These were from a local machinery company, a technology start-up, Norway?s major agricultural research institution, a large agronomic services provider, and the farmers who hosted experiments. The results include (i) a breakdown of expected value propositions with points of contention, (ii) strengths and weaknesses of the processes involved, and (iii) scoring against the six major OFE principles. We discuss how this OFE project exemplifies key global issues in research practice calling for new agronomy, and we argue that room for exchanges must be made within projects to achieve farmer-centricity and solve enduring issues; however, beyond any individual effort or process fault, constraints lie with scientific institutional settings that do not incentivize researchers to conduct farmer-centric research.

eCommons (Cornell University)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Agriculture and Farm Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing on-farm experimentation value propositions, processes, and principles: A Norwegian pasture case study · eCommons (Cornell University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS