Exploring drivers’ psychological responses in spiral tunnel: visual attention and subjective perceptions

The objective of this study was to investigate the challenges associated with driving in spiral tunnels through a comprehensive analysis of both visual performance and subjective perceptions of drivers. By comparing driving behavior in spiral tunnels to that in conventional curved tunnels, the study aimed to identify specific differences in visual attention, cognitive processing, and perceived workload, ultimately informing tunnel design and safety improvements. Naturalistic driving experiments were conducted in two different tunnel environments: A conventional curved tunnel and a spiral tunnel. Participating drivers were equipped with eye-tracking device to measure visual performance indicators such as average fixation duration, average pupil diameter, average saccade duration, and average saccade amplitude. Additionally, drivers’ subjective perceptions of workload were assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) scale, which evaluates mental, physical, temporal, and emotional demands, as well as overall performance and frustration. The results of the study revealed significant differences in drivers’ visual performance and subjective perceptions between spiral and curved tunnels. In spiral tunnels, drivers exhibited longer average fixation durations and larger average pupil diameters, indicating increased cognitive processing and visual attention requirements. Furthermore, drivers in spiral tunnels had longer average saccade durations and smaller average saccade amplitudes, suggesting a more cautious and focused visual scanning strategy due to the tight turns and limited visibility. Subjectively, drivers reported significantly higher workload across all dimensions of the NASA-TLX scale in spiral tunnels, indicating greater mental, physical, temporal, and emotional demands compared to curved tunnels. This study reveals the challenges of spiral tunnels for drivers, especially regarding visual attention and cognitive load. It suggests that improving tunnel design elements like lighting, signage, and road surfaces can lower drivers’ cognitive demands and improve their visual processing. The research also emphasizes the importance of specialized driver training for navigating these tunnels safely. In summary, the findings enhance transportation safety by offering insights into driving behavior in complex tunnels and suggesting methods to reduce risks.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28462582.v1
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring drivers’ psychological responses in spiral tunnel: visual attention and subjective perceptions

Figshare
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Exploring drivers’ psychological responses in spiral tunnel: visual attention and subjective perceptions

article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the challenges associated with driving in spiral tunnels through a comprehensive analysis of both visual performance and subjective perceptions of drivers. By comparing driving behavior in spiral tunnels to that in conventional curved tunnels, the study aimed to identify specific differences in visual attention, cognitive processing, and perceived workload, ultimately informing tunnel design and safety improvements. Naturalistic driving experiments were conducted in two different tunnel environments: A conventional curved tunnel and a spiral tunnel. Participating drivers were equipped with eye-tracking device to measure visual performance indicators such as average fixation duration, average pupil diameter, average saccade duration, and average saccade amplitude. Additionally, drivers’ subjective perceptions of workload were assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) scale, which evaluates mental, physical, temporal, and emotional demands, as well as overall performance and frustration. The results of the study revealed significant differences in drivers’ visual performance and subjective perceptions between spiral and curved tunnels. In spiral tunnels, drivers exhibited longer average fixation durations and larger average pupil diameters, indicating increased cognitive processing and visual attention requirements. Furthermore, drivers in spiral tunnels had longer average saccade durations and smaller average saccade amplitudes, suggesting a more cautious and focused visual scanning strategy due to the tight turns and limited visibility. Subjectively, drivers reported significantly higher workload across all dimensions of the NASA-TLX scale in spiral tunnels, indicating greater mental, physical, temporal, and emotional demands compared to curved tunnels. This study reveals the challenges of spiral tunnels for drivers, especially regarding visual attention and cognitive load. It suggests that improving tunnel design elements like lighting, signage, and road surfaces can lower drivers’ cognitive demands and improve their visual processing. The research also emphasizes the importance of specialized driver training for navigating these tunnels safely. In summary, the findings enhance transportation safety by offering insights into driving behavior in complex tunnels and suggesting methods to reduce risks.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring drivers’ psychological responses in spiral tunnel: visual attention and subjective perceptions · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS