A Corpus-based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of Advanced English Text Comprehension in EAP Textbooks and Academic Research Papers

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-font-kerning:1.0pt; mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;} This study investigates the syntactic complexity of reading comprehension texts in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) textbooks and academic research papers. By comparing these two text types, the research aims to identify the challenges EAP learners may face in transitioning from simplified instructional materials to complex scholarly texts. A corpus-based approach was employed to analyze the syntactic parameters of 30 EAP textbook passages and 30 research paper discussion sections across three disciplines (Psychology, Accounting, and Pharmacy). The L2SCA tool was used to assess 14 syntactic measures, including sentence length, clause complexity, and lexical density. The findings reveal significant differences in syntactic complexity between EAP textbooks and academic research papers. EAP textbooks generally exhibit simpler syntactic structures, shorter sentences, and a lower structural density compared to scholarly articles. These disparities may hinder EAP learners' ability to comprehend and effectively engage with academic research. The study's results emphasize the need for more discipline-specific EAP materials and tailored language instruction to address the unique syntactic challenges encountered in academic reading. By understanding the syntactic complexities of scholarly texts, educators can better prepare learners for the demands of academic discourse.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on English Language Education
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71673/relp.2025.1195182
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Corpus-based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of Advanced English Text Comprehension in EAP Textbooks and Academic Research Papers

Research on English Language Education
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

A Corpus-based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of Advanced English Text Comprehension in EAP Textbooks and Academic Research Papers

article en

Abstract

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-font-kerning:1.0pt; mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;} This study investigates the syntactic complexity of reading comprehension texts in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) textbooks and academic research papers. By comparing these two text types, the research aims to identify the challenges EAP learners may face in transitioning from simplified instructional materials to complex scholarly texts. A corpus-based approach was employed to analyze the syntactic parameters of 30 EAP textbook passages and 30 research paper discussion sections across three disciplines (Psychology, Accounting, and Pharmacy). The L2SCA tool was used to assess 14 syntactic measures, including sentence length, clause complexity, and lexical density. The findings reveal significant differences in syntactic complexity between EAP textbooks and academic research papers. EAP textbooks generally exhibit simpler syntactic structures, shorter sentences, and a lower structural density compared to scholarly articles. These disparities may hinder EAP learners' ability to comprehend and effectively engage with academic research. The study's results emphasize the need for more discipline-specific EAP materials and tailored language instruction to address the unique syntactic challenges encountered in academic reading. By understanding the syntactic complexities of scholarly texts, educators can better prepare learners for the demands of academic discourse.

Research on English Language Education
Chabahar Maritime University (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Corpus-based Comparison of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of Advanced English Text Comprehension in EAP Textbooks and Academic Research Papers · Research on English Language Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS