Inter-Rater Reliability and Acceptability of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

One-in-six cases of atraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in North America are thought to be precipitated by opioid overdose, but many of these cases are not obvious and there is no gold standard used by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel to identify opioid-associated (OA)-OHCA. The NAloxone Cardiac ARrest Decision Instrument (NACARDI) was developed and validated to identify potential OA-OHCA, however it has not yet been used in the field. We sought to prospectively assess the inter-rater reliability and acceptability of NACARDI in real-world OHCA. Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated the NACARDI criteria during acute resuscitations of patients with OHCA in San Francisco between September 2022–February 2024. The NACARDI rule utilized in this study consisted of two criteria: patient age <60 years and unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Clinicians completed a short survey that included free-text questions, multiple choice question, and Likert-type scales rating NACARDI’s ease of use, describing when during the resuscitation they were able to assess NACARDI, and identifying potential barriers. In cases where two clinicians completed NARCADI assessments for a single OHCA case, we calculated a kappa coefficient of agreement. Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated 149 cases of OHCA and completed 198 surveys − 100 (67.1%) cases had one survey response and 49 (32.9%) had survey responses from two EMS personnel. Clinicians were able to ascertain NACARDI criteria “prior to or during the first cardiac rhythm check” in 80.3% of cases. NACARDI was reported as “easy to use” by 83.3% of respondents. The overall Kappa coefficient for NACARDI was 0.73 (95%CI 0.51–0.95). The three most common reasons why NACARDI criteria were deemed difficult to ascertain were chaotic scene, language barrier, and unreliable bystander accounts. There was reasonable agreement in how NACARDI was interpreted for OHCA cases and the majority of surveyed EMS clinicians found NACARDI easy to use. These findings suggest that NACARDI can be reliably and easily used by EMS clinicians during acute OHCA resuscitations to identify OA-OHCA patients, potentially informing inclusion criteria for future research studies and guiding targeted interventions for this patient population.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29533019.v2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-Rater Reliability and Acceptability of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Figshare
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Inter-Rater Reliability and Acceptability of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

article en

Abstract

One-in-six cases of atraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in North America are thought to be precipitated by opioid overdose, but many of these cases are not obvious and there is no gold standard used by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel to identify opioid-associated (OA)-OHCA. The NAloxone Cardiac ARrest Decision Instrument (NACARDI) was developed and validated to identify potential OA-OHCA, however it has not yet been used in the field. We sought to prospectively assess the inter-rater reliability and acceptability of NACARDI in real-world OHCA. Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated the NACARDI criteria during acute resuscitations of patients with OHCA in San Francisco between September 2022–February 2024. The NACARDI rule utilized in this study consisted of two criteria: patient age <60 years and unwitnessed cardiac arrest. Clinicians completed a short survey that included free-text questions, multiple choice question, and Likert-type scales rating NACARDI’s ease of use, describing when during the resuscitation they were able to assess NACARDI, and identifying potential barriers. In cases where two clinicians completed NARCADI assessments for a single OHCA case, we calculated a kappa coefficient of agreement. Emergency medical service clinicians evaluated 149 cases of OHCA and completed 198 surveys − 100 (67.1%) cases had one survey response and 49 (32.9%) had survey responses from two EMS personnel. Clinicians were able to ascertain NACARDI criteria “prior to or during the first cardiac rhythm check” in 80.3% of cases. NACARDI was reported as “easy to use” by 83.3% of respondents. The overall Kappa coefficient for NACARDI was 0.73 (95%CI 0.51–0.95). The three most common reasons why NACARDI criteria were deemed difficult to ascertain were chaotic scene, language barrier, and unreliable bystander accounts. There was reasonable agreement in how NACARDI was interpreted for OHCA cases and the majority of surveyed EMS clinicians found NACARDI easy to use. These findings suggest that NACARDI can be reliably and easily used by EMS clinicians during acute OHCA resuscitations to identify OA-OHCA patients, potentially informing inclusion criteria for future research studies and guiding targeted interventions for this patient population.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inter-Rater Reliability and Acceptability of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS