Implementation of the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline in primary care

Purpose of the Project: To increase proper evaluation of adults who present with microscopic hematuria by implementing the standardized use of the American Urological Association’s (AUA) microscopic hematuria guideline by primary care providers. Methodology: A primary care provider in Northern NJ implemented the AUA’s microhematuria guideline into his practice to evaluate patients who presented with microhematuria. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the evaluation of the adult patients (n=15) who presented to the office prior to the intervention and a prospective chart review was performed to assess adult patients (n=15) with microhematuria who presented after the intervention. Results Age: pre-intervention M=69.53, SD=9.841, post-intervention: M=65.93, SD=14518. Gender: pre-intervention: 9 females (60%), 6 males (40%), post-intervention: 7 females (46.7%), 8 males (53.5%). Smoker: 19 (63.3%). Non-smoker: 11 (36.7%). Risk factors: pre-intervention: 15 (100%), post-intervention: 15 (100%). Blood (+) on dipstick: pre-intervention: 15 (100%), post-intervention 15 (100%). Blood on microUA (>3RBCs/HPF): Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 13 (86.7%). Diagnosis of microhematuria: Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 13 (86.7%). Appropriate evaluation according to AUA guideline: pre-intervention: 1 (6.7%), post-intervention: 17 (100%). Correct referral to urologist: Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 15 (100%), Pearson Chi-Square: p=0.032, df=1. Implications for Practice: The data and statistical analysis reveal the utilization of the AUA microhematuria guideline enhances patient evaluations and referrals to urologists, which could lead to overall improved patient outcomes.

Publication Details

Journal
Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-v5rn-7e66
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline in primary care

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Implementation of the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline in primary care

article en

Abstract

Purpose of the Project: To increase proper evaluation of adults who present with microscopic hematuria by implementing the standardized use of the American Urological Association’s (AUA) microscopic hematuria guideline by primary care providers. Methodology: A primary care provider in Northern NJ implemented the AUA’s microhematuria guideline into his practice to evaluate patients who presented with microhematuria. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the evaluation of the adult patients (n=15) who presented to the office prior to the intervention and a prospective chart review was performed to assess adult patients (n=15) with microhematuria who presented after the intervention. Results Age: pre-intervention M=69.53, SD=9.841, post-intervention: M=65.93, SD=14518. Gender: pre-intervention: 9 females (60%), 6 males (40%), post-intervention: 7 females (46.7%), 8 males (53.5%). Smoker: 19 (63.3%). Non-smoker: 11 (36.7%). Risk factors: pre-intervention: 15 (100%), post-intervention: 15 (100%). Blood (+) on dipstick: pre-intervention: 15 (100%), post-intervention 15 (100%). Blood on microUA (>3RBCs/HPF): Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 13 (86.7%). Diagnosis of microhematuria: Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 13 (86.7%). Appropriate evaluation according to AUA guideline: pre-intervention: 1 (6.7%), post-intervention: 17 (100%). Correct referral to urologist: Pre-intervention: 11 (73.3%), post-intervention: 15 (100%), Pearson Chi-Square: p=0.032, df=1. Implications for Practice: The data and statistical analysis reveal the utilization of the AUA microhematuria guideline enhances patient evaluations and referrals to urologists, which could lead to overall improved patient outcomes.

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation of the American Urological Association's microhematuria guideline in primary care · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS