Explicating the holistic communication privacy management process: Examining how Christian parents of queer children manage the information around their children’s queer identity

In the United States, over one fifth of generation Z identifies as queer. Similarly, almost 70% of adults identify as Christian. The likelihood that Christian parents have a child who identifies as queer is becoming increasingly more common. This dissertation set out to understand how Christian parents manage the privacy around their child’s queer identity using communication privacy management theory (CPM). CPM argues that privacy management occurs through three subprocesses: (a) privacy rule foundations (i.e., how people decide whether or not to disclose), (b) privacy coordination (i.e., how individuals manage their privacy), and (c) privacy turbulence and recalibration (i.e., when privacy breaks down and how individuals reestablish control over the information). Aiming to identify how the three subprocesses occur in holistically patterned ways, I used thematic co-occurrence analysis (TCA) to analyze 30 interviews with Christian parents of queer children. Ultimately, the findings established four new concepts that extended CPM: (a) chance criteria (those that occur randomly in life and prompt disclosure), (b) fractional ownership (a fourth boundary ownership type in which parents recognize the information belongs primarily to their child; however, they argue they control a fraction of it), (c) the privacy rule of trust (using past behaviors of recipients to determine the individual is trustworthy), and (d) perceived turbulence (when parents perceive that recipients are sharing the information with others, however, they lack any knowledge of such transgressions). Additionally, TCA helped identify two holistic CPM patterns: (a) the identity facilitated privacy management pattern and (b) the support facilitated privacy management pattern. These findings both extended CPM and provided practical applications.

Publication Details

Journal
Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7282/t3-49bm-3q61
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explicating the holistic communication privacy management process: Examining how Christian parents of queer children manage the information around their children’s queer identity

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Explicating the holistic communication privacy management process: Examining how Christian parents of queer children manage the information around their children’s queer identity

article en

Abstract

In the United States, over one fifth of generation Z identifies as queer. Similarly, almost 70% of adults identify as Christian. The likelihood that Christian parents have a child who identifies as queer is becoming increasingly more common. This dissertation set out to understand how Christian parents manage the privacy around their child’s queer identity using communication privacy management theory (CPM). CPM argues that privacy management occurs through three subprocesses: (a) privacy rule foundations (i.e., how people decide whether or not to disclose), (b) privacy coordination (i.e., how individuals manage their privacy), and (c) privacy turbulence and recalibration (i.e., when privacy breaks down and how individuals reestablish control over the information). Aiming to identify how the three subprocesses occur in holistically patterned ways, I used thematic co-occurrence analysis (TCA) to analyze 30 interviews with Christian parents of queer children. Ultimately, the findings established four new concepts that extended CPM: (a) chance criteria (those that occur randomly in life and prompt disclosure), (b) fractional ownership (a fourth boundary ownership type in which parents recognize the information belongs primarily to their child; however, they argue they control a fraction of it), (c) the privacy rule of trust (using past behaviors of recipients to determine the individual is trustworthy), and (d) perceived turbulence (when parents perceive that recipients are sharing the information with others, however, they lack any knowledge of such transgressions). Additionally, TCA helped identify two holistic CPM patterns: (a) the identity facilitated privacy management pattern and (b) the support facilitated privacy management pattern. These findings both extended CPM and provided practical applications.

Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.