Evaluating ImageTrend Collaborate as a National EMS Dataset: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with the National EMS Information System

ImageTrend Collaborate (ITC) is a new dataset of emergency medical services (EMS) patient care events. While offering a new option for prehospital research, it is unclear if ITC data accurately reflects EMS event characteristics across the United States. Our objective was to assess the national representativeness of the ITC dataset. We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the 2022 ITC with the 2022 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) research dataset, a federally funded national EMS data repository. We compared 9-1-1 EMS activations across call (e.g., agency level of service, urbanicity, census region), patient (e.g., age category, sex, dispatch complaint, response time, primary symptom, primary impression), and intervention (e.g., procedures) characteristics. We quantified absolute proportional differences (PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of observed differences. We included 9,592,122 EMS events in ITC and 41,997,730 in NEMSIS. ImageTrend Collaborate included a higher proportion of fire-based agencies (PD 8.2, SMD 0.16) and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians (PD 2.1, SMD 0.12) and lower proportion of volunteer agencies (PD -1.4, SMD -0.12). Census Region differences included West (PD 13.9, SMD 0.31), Northeast (PD -11.0, SMD -0.33), and Midwest (PD -5.2, SMD -0.14). Age, sex, dispatch complaint, and primary impression had absolute proportional differences less than 1.0% with SMD less than 0.10 (i.e., negligible) except for “sick person” dispatch (PD -3.0, SMD -0.08) and “other general” primary symptom (PD -1.5, SMD -0.11). Median response times were identical in both databases. The most common procedures were similar between the datasets, but differed in proportion, including: catheterization of vein (PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12 lead electrocardiogram (PD -7.9, SMD -0.22), and evaluation procedure (PD -3.8, SMD -0.15). ImageTrend Collaborate reflects most national EMS call, patient, and intervention characteristics. Notable and expected differences between ITC and NEMSIS include fire-based agency and census region representation, likely due to self-selection; however, differences in procedures may reflect tradeoffs between granularity of a single vendor dataset versus an aggregated national dataset. Prehospital researchers should understand the characteristics of the ITC dataset to ensure proper use and analysis.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29497299.v1
Primary Topic
European Linguistics and Anthropology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ImageTrend Collaborate as a National EMS Dataset: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with the National EMS Information System

Figshare
European Linguistics and Anthropology
article

Evaluating ImageTrend Collaborate as a National EMS Dataset: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with the National EMS Information System

article en

Abstract

ImageTrend Collaborate (ITC) is a new dataset of emergency medical services (EMS) patient care events. While offering a new option for prehospital research, it is unclear if ITC data accurately reflects EMS event characteristics across the United States. Our objective was to assess the national representativeness of the ITC dataset. We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the 2022 ITC with the 2022 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) research dataset, a federally funded national EMS data repository. We compared 9-1-1 EMS activations across call (e.g., agency level of service, urbanicity, census region), patient (e.g., age category, sex, dispatch complaint, response time, primary symptom, primary impression), and intervention (e.g., procedures) characteristics. We quantified absolute proportional differences (PD, ITC% - NEMSIS%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized mean differences (SMD) to evaluate the effect size of observed differences. We included 9,592,122 EMS events in ITC and 41,997,730 in NEMSIS. ImageTrend Collaborate included a higher proportion of fire-based agencies (PD 8.2, SMD 0.16) and Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians (PD 2.1, SMD 0.12) and lower proportion of volunteer agencies (PD -1.4, SMD -0.12). Census Region differences included West (PD 13.9, SMD 0.31), Northeast (PD -11.0, SMD -0.33), and Midwest (PD -5.2, SMD -0.14). Age, sex, dispatch complaint, and primary impression had absolute proportional differences less than 1.0% with SMD less than 0.10 (i.e., negligible) except for “sick person” dispatch (PD -3.0, SMD -0.08) and “other general” primary symptom (PD -1.5, SMD -0.11). Median response times were identical in both databases. The most common procedures were similar between the datasets, but differed in proportion, including: catheterization of vein (PD -4.8, SMD -0.12), 12 lead electrocardiogram (PD -7.9, SMD -0.22), and evaluation procedure (PD -3.8, SMD -0.15). ImageTrend Collaborate reflects most national EMS call, patient, and intervention characteristics. Notable and expected differences between ITC and NEMSIS include fire-based agency and census region representation, likely due to self-selection; however, differences in procedures may reflect tradeoffs between granularity of a single vendor dataset versus an aggregated national dataset. Prehospital researchers should understand the characteristics of the ITC dataset to ensure proper use and analysis.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
European Linguistics and Anthropology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.